User talk:D.barry429

Conflict of interest
Hello, D.barry429. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
 * You need to be exceedingly careful with the article. I've reverted your edits since they were very unambiguously promotional in tone. This is pretty much why the article gained attention in the first place, because people from the agency (one of which is yourself) came on to the article to add very, very promotional content. Sentences like "Together, they saw a pressing need bring more economic and creative control into the hands of composers and music talents who had become crucial to the experience of movies, television and interactive media." are extremely promotional to the point where it is very, very inappropriate for Wikipedia. This is pretty much why Wikipedia heavily discourages editing with a conflict of interest. It's very difficult for people to edit in neutral tones, especially if they're used to writing marketing material for a living. It's very likely that you're used to editing with a promotional tone to the point where you're used to writing like this.
 * I'd like to formally ask that you refrain from making any big edits to the article like you have thus far under this account and under the account name DbarryGSA. Right now what you're doing isn't helping the article out- if anything, your edits are actually making the article look worse than better. A Wikipedia article is supposed to be neutral in tone and fit the general format of an encyclopedia article. It is not an official profile page (meaning that your company does not WP:OWN the article) and as such should not read like a profile on CrunchBase, Linkedin, or any other marketing database. The best thing you can do right now is add reliable sources to the article like news articles that are about the agency. Writing promotional WP:PUFFERY will not accomplish anything and as said above, it'll do far more harm than good. Wikipedia editors are pretty used to seeing promotional content and in most cases it just gives off the impression that an organization is non-notable rather than notable, since notability is not judged based on how pretty the article is laid out, but on the strength of its sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I'd also like to ask that you only make edits under one account name. I'm not sure why you opened a new account, since Wikipedia tends to prefer that people have only one account unless they have a very good reason as to why two are necessary. (IE, editing from public/private computers, forgotten password, etc- you can see more on this at WP:MULTIPLE) If you do have multiple accounts you need to have the rationale for the two accounts on your user page AND you also need to divulge any conflict of interest on your user page as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Film concerts live


A tag has been placed on Film concerts live, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. KSFT talk 00:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Film concerts live


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Film concerts live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 00:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
Obvious sockpuppet of. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)