User talk:D.hallstead/sandbox

Peer Review
D.hallstead, you have the base of a good Wikipedia article here. A few suggestions are to change boldface the lead and link your article in the style of a Wikipedia article. Also cite your references in the text and link them. As for the main paragraph maybe break it up into sections with a lead and then explain its style/iconography, as the paragraph seems very dense. Another thing that would strength this article would be pictures of the text itself, to help understand the style it created. Otherwise great work!

Prof. Feedback
Devianna, What you have written as your draft has the makings of a good introduction for your final article, it captures in rough form some of the key aspects of the mss. Here are elements to consider as you revise: Please touch base with any questions. If you dig in and work on this, you can still turn this into a good entry that shares an important topic with the world. ALMc AMcClanan (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)AMcClanan
 * take another look at the assignment, you're supposed to add at least 600 words of content
 * also, it looks like you've completed none of the eight Wikipedia orientation modules. The entry in your sandbox isn't formatted or written like a Wikipedia entry. A few aspects are: lack of citations, lack of links to other entries, tone
 * the research is limited, if you can find more sources (and we discussed some leads earlier) then it will be easier to expand your entry to give the topic justice.