User talk:D.martorelli

Giulio Costanzi
Could you not remove the maintenance (stub) tag? We need to tag the articles so that other editors will be able to work on them. thanks. Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Directorate for Studies and Experiments
A tag has been placed on Directorate for Studies and Experiments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 13:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
As per your request, I have removed the deletion tag from your article mentioned above. Please feel free to contact me if you require guidance on how to make the article meet our standards. Manning (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guidonians
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Guidonians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 14:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

CSRMA
I am having difficults getting Google hits for Center for Studies and Research in Aeronautical Medicine. If you want the article to survive, you must provide some reliable, independent links. (The name in Italian might help!) &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making such a mess
You are making quite a mess of Wikipedia. Four times, here, here, here, and here, you've just dumped blocks of text into the middle of articles that in large parts duplicated content that was already there. You've created duplicate articles (C-41 Italian Rocket duplicating SISPRE, Crocco mission duplicating Crocco Grand Tour, and Center of Studies and Research on Aeronautical Medicine duplicating Center for Studies and Research in Aeronautical Medicine). You've created a context-less stub at Poligono di Furbara which makes no effort to link title to content. Your translations of organizational names and some of the content that you provide seem to bear no relation to documented reality at times. And you've entirely failed to respond, anywhere, to people trying to talk to you about this. You've placed hangon tags without using article talk pages. You've simply created duplicate articles by slightly modified titles when people challenge the verifiability of your subjects and content. And you've made no effort to respond to RHaworth above or to the editor who asked you about Directorate for Studies and Experiments and gave you four days to respond. Please stop making such a mess, and please talk to the people who are trying to communicate with you. Uncle G (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)