User talk:D091910

Your edits on Pinoy Big Brother articles.
I've reverted your edits on the nomination tables on Pinoy Big Brother (season 1) and Pinoy Big Brother (season 2). First and foremost, the article should use the terms used in the show itself ("voluntary exit" and "forced eviction") instead of those used in the UK show ("walked" and "ejected" respectively), because WP:BIGBRO doesn't mention on which terms to use. So don't force the UK terms on articles that don't actually use them (to show you what I mean, Big Brother 2 (U.S.) uses "expelled" instead of "ejected").

Also, don't remove the nomination and eviction days on the nominations tables because they were held in irregular intervals and nominations did not necessarily happen weekly. Also, those articles don't even have the weekly highlights sections, so if you insist on removing those nomination and eviction days, how can one tell when those events happened when there are no weekly highlights section to indicate them. So don't assume nominations happened weekly; it doesn't necessarily happen here. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 03:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Loft Story 1
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Loft Story 1, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Loft Story (France). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Loft Story 2
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Loft Story 2, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Loft Story (France). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Secret Story 2010 (France)
A tag has been placed on Secret Story 2010 (France) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 18:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Your edits on Big Brother (U.S.) articles
I've reverted your edits on Seasons 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. The borders were added as a result of a discussion during a previous season to separate the HouseGuests votes from the other sections and to make the tables easier to read. Also the sources row is needed, past articles will have to have a source row added to them. This point was brought up with Big Brother 2009 (UK) as the tables can be considered original research, having a row with sources for each week verifies the information. If you feel that these should be changed please start a discussion on a talk page. A good page would be Big Brother 11 (U.S.) since a lot of editors are editing that article more than the others right now.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  20:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I also have revered you edits to Big Brother 11 (U.S.). The table was expanded upon based on a small discussion. Please stop changing things on articles without checking out the discussion history beforehand. If you feel something should be removed, mention it on the talk page, because edits that are that bold are just going to get reverted, especially if people have already settled on something. Thanks. – Tür  î∂n  15:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Survivor (Slovenia)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Survivor (Slovenia). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Survivor (Slovenia). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Removing information that was added as a result of a consensus. Reverted edits on the following articles Big Brother 6 (U.S.), Big Brother 7 (U.S.), Big Brother 8 (U.S.), Big Brother 9 (U.S.) for same reasons.''  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  22:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

...
I agree with not having the infobox with purple colors; however that goes against consensus (but I am not reverting it because I agree). Also, saying we should be banned for good faith edits is not a good idea. – túrian  patois  02:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)