User talk:D203

Welcome
Hi, D203. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  04:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

==File:Vcubasketball.jpg=

Hello, File:Vcubasketball.jpg was labeled with "The use of this file is permitted only on Wikipedia." This kind of license is not permitted on Wikipedia. If it is your own picture can you release it as CC-BY-SA-3.0? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:08, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:VCU Fight Song.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:VCU Fight Song.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:RPI_Logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:RPI_Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

File:RPI_Logo.svg
I have tagged File:RPI_Logo.svg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 01:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried (03:36, 25 March 2010 ) to give Medical College of Virginia a different title (VCU Medical Center) by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 18:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

VCU edits
Hello. I recently made a lot of changes to VCU in order to conform it with Wikipedia policies. I have cited some of these policies in the edit summaries and will try to elaborate briefly below since I know you are a newer editor to Wikipedia, but it is important that you seek out understanding before reverting edits, as this could result in being blocked.


 * The History list was changed to prose (it wasn't deleted, just changed in format) per WP:EMBED and in conformance with the History sections of University Featured Articles (U-FAs) -- check out these FAs to get an idea of what Wikipedia shoots for in format and quality
 * "Ph.D." (etc.) removed per WP:CREDENTIAL
 * Extant coverage of VCU Expansion removed per WP:NOT. As I said in the edit summary, a brief remark about an expansion with a link to more information may be suitable, but that is all.
 * The individual rankings were removed since (1) they were outdated and (2) they had no reliable source to support them. They could be reintegrated (but as prose, not a list) if supporting information can be found. (By the way, why did you attempt to remove the standard rankings table? That constitutes vandalism.)

I hope this helps. Like I said, please seek out clarification if needed and read up on WP:POLICY, but sweeping reverts do not help. Here's hoping to work together to improve the article. Cheers —Eustress talk 01:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Following thread moved from User talk:Eustress in order to centralize conversation
 * Hi Eustress,


 * I appreciate your insight on helping me make this more within the guidelines of wikipedia. I have been working on the VCU wiki page for a long time and was curious with the extent of the edits but understand now. I didn't mean to delete the University rankings and actually like that it was put in there. Thanks for finding that information. I will add a small section of the expansion for VCU and a VCU 2020 individual page. I do want to ask though why the history timeline had to be removed? I understand that it is best to go to prose when you can but the timeline makes it a lot easier to read than the paragraphs of history. I also want to ask you about the individual rankings? The individual rankings can be found at http://www.vcu.edu/ranking/ I'm glad you wrote me and gave me an explanation of what was going on. There hasn't been a lot of edits on this page for a long time and to have a large amount of edits in one day took me back. I look forward to working on this page with you. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by D203 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * {Note: I moved your response here so we can keep the conversation in one spot. This is preferred (see WP:TALK) so that others who may oversee the conversation can interpret comments in context. If you wish to apprise me of a response on your talk page, you can use tb, but it's not necessary.}


 * I think you may benefit from reading WP:UNIGUIDE, a set of MOS addenda created by WP:UNI. Prose is preferred to a list in the case of a History timeline since timeline bullets lack context. My reformatting didn't help with context much -- a lot of work still needed on VCU History -- but now it's primed for contextualization. Regarding the individual rankings, we need a reliable source; i.e., from an independent, third party -- not from VCU. They also need to be in prose and not list. Since no verifiable and valid sources were listed, best to leave out for now.


 * You've done a lot of good work on this article, so hopefully I can lend a hand to make it even better! —Eustress talk 02:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of VCU Rams football


A tag has been placed on VCU Rams football requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RVA logo for Richmond, VA.png
 Thanks for uploading File:RVA logo for Richmond, VA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:VCU Medical center logo.jpg.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:VCU Medical center logo.jpg.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:VCU Medical Center logo.tif)
Thanks for uploading File:VCU Medical Center logo.tif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big East Conference. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Michael Greiner 20:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of VCU Rowdy Rams


A tag has been placed on VCU Rowdy Rams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of VCU Rowdy Rams for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VCU Rowdy Rams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/VCU Rowdy Rams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  19:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official VCU seal.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Official VCU seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythe hornetfan  19:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of VCU expansion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VCU expansion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/VCU expansion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)