User talk:D3f

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Nuttycoconut (talk) 07:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply to your comment
Hi, thanks for your reply. I apologise for calling it "vandalism". Please note however that wiki serves as an encyclopedia and not a forum for raising concerns about individual teaching staff, however valid it may be. You may note that the most recent edit has now in fact included a paragraph about this staff member (and about the school's webpage being hacked). This addition is more appropriate as it is written in a news format (i.e. more encyclopedic) rather than as a forum-like discussion. By the way, I'm not sure how long the latest addition will stay on before it gets deleted because it hasn't cited a reference for this. If you can find and cite a reference for this alleged incident, it is more likely to stay intact. Cheers --Nuttycoconut (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC) PS. By the way, if you wish to leave messages for someone, click on the "talk" link next to the name, not on the name itself.

Creating a Big Problem
I don't know where you're getting your information but it is false. The picture you're posting is not a teacher at this school. Your actions constitute defamation. You immediately must undo your changes to the wiki entry and the changes to the website and cease further vandalism. Your hack to the school website was completely illegal regardless of your intentions. There is enough of an IP address and time stamp trail to identify you should this continue. Vjcos (talk) 07:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:8ftz0v9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:8ftz0v9.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 13:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)