User talk:D4R1U5/Archive 2

iPhone 8
Hi. Recently I added a section to the iPhone 8 page, titled “Battery issues”. You removed it without giving any reason. I added the section because it is a noteworthy issue affecting the device. Can you explain why it is not deserving of a description?

124.178.109.162 (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied on their talk page. Darius robin (talk) 11:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The current consensus on the talk page is that the issue is notable. The cited problem is undue weight, and my solution is to add it in Reception instead of its own section. Apple considers it noteworthy, and yes, out of the millions of devices sold, so I believe it is more than worthy of a description. Would this solution be acceptable?


 * 124.178.109.162 (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * 8-10 articles that come from major news sources and reached a lot of people. Would it be acceptable to add a comment to the end of the Reception section stating something along the lines of “Recently after the device went on sale, a small number of devices suffered from a major battery issue, and were investigated by Apple. The issue was given large media attention.” I can’t see anything wrong with that.


 * 124.178.109.162 (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources Removal in JESC2017 Article
Hello, I saw you reverted my edits in JESC2017 article. So, I removed the sources because that's what we do every year. When the official website reveals the final list of participants we replace all the sources with one that proves all the participation of all the participants. If you don't know what I mean, just take a look at last year's Junior Eurovision article. That's why I will remove them once again. -- Dimsar01 talk 09:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Darius robin! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:29, Saturday, August 12, 2017 (UTC)

iPhone 8
(sterofuse) Hello Darius Robin, I am new to this so please bear with my formatting errors. In the "List of iOS Devices" wiki page you contributed an edit stating the images for iphone 8 and 8 Plus were the same as on Apple's website. I threw the images in CAD to look at the speaker vent sizes and noticed the images are indeed incorrect. I am not sure where the images came from but on Apple's website you can compare devices and see the difference between the 8 Plus, 7 Plus, and 6s Plus side by side. I did this, saved a screenshot, and posted it on imgur. Here is a direct link to it: iPhone 8 Plus, 7 Plus, 6s Plus body comparison. Do with this information what you may. Just trying to be helpful. Sterofuse07 (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply, I didn't see your comment as it was on the top of the page. I know about the difference in the earpiece size. But I feel that the picture that's upload about the iPhone 8 does indeed have the correct size as shown on Apple's website. Besides, even if it is a tad bit smaller, it doesn't make much difference, and most people won't notice. Then again, someone else has to upload another image, which I don't know who will. Darius robin (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk page
Why are you adding things to my talk page that I decided to remove? Dorglorg (talk) 06:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry, you are not allowed to remove other's messages from your talk page (that's how Wikipedia works). Darius robin (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * See the rule at WP:TPO. Darius robin (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That is blatantly incorrect; you should see WP:OWNTALK (which is further down in the page), which states that you are allowed to remove other's comments from your own talk page, granted it's not done in a way that changes the meaning of the discussion at hand. Sky  Warrior  16:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * – I meant that you cannot remove warnings from your talk page, as he kept removing it. Darius robin (talk) 16:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You're wrong on that end as well. In fact, WP:OWNTALK explicitly allows that, saying that "the removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user". Sky  Warrior  16:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, but I will report him if he still doesn't stop vandalizing. Darius robin (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Dispute
Why are you rendering all my changes as unconstructive vandalism? There has to be some system of checks and balances, you cannot unilaterally decide that my changes constitute vandalism surely? Furthermore, I need some kind of explanation qualifying why I committed vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.103.163 (talk) 16:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello. So is there an age limit for playing sports? That is a biased view. This is not blatant vandalism. Just because you think there is some unfair age limit for people playing sports does not mean that should be the case. I only provided factual information in those articles and feel I am am being unfairly targeted based on subjective beliefs on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.103.163 (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Ousmane Dembélé
Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ousmane Dembélé, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. May i ask where is the source for his shirt number? Matthew_hk  t  c  16:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Official source. Darius robin (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Lionel Messi
You removed the game and not the goal. Please fix it. Wolfgang (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * He didn't score in the game, it was given as an own goal to Alin Tosca. Darius robin (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I know! But you deleted his appearance, not goal! Wolfgang (talk) 12:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I know, his last goal was the one in May, I restored your edit to the appearance. Darius robin (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Manuel Custódia
Hello Darius robin. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Manuel Custódia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing a non-extra role in a notable movie/TV show indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  15:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

iOS
Hi, my edit in iOS to use wikidata is not a test, please don't revert it. Why did you revert it? Do you really understand my edit? --Ans (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but no one seems to agree on that. Darius robin (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please explain why do you not agree my edit on that? --Ans (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IOS 11 Control Center.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IOS 11 Control Center.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Why was this removed?
Hi, I'm curious on why you removed my requested article? This was not a test and wondering why you felt it was a test? The message I received is below. I'm fairly new to wiki editing and want to do things properly moving foward. "An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Requested articles/music/Performers, bands and songwriters seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox." - Thanks Hrc333

Your requested article was fine, but along with that I also noticed some test edits with " ". Also, I recommend you to use  at the end of your talk page comments. This will insert your name and talk page link without having to manually type it. Darius robin (talk) 18:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply but I'm not sure I understand what the test edits were. Could you explain more? And thanks for the tip on signing posts. Hrc333 (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I just went back and looked at what I wrote and it seems to follow the exact same format that the other requests followed. Can you please explain what flagged this as test edits. Hrc333 (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please see this. Your article request was fine, but somehow, just above the 'A-L' section, some mistaken text got put up.

I'll add your request back and remove it myself. Darius robin (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Got it! Thanks for fixing this. I get it now. Not sure how that was added and was not sure how to check to see the edit. Now I know all that. I appreciate you taking a little time and walking me through this. Now I know more for future edits. Thanks. Hrc333 (talk) 05:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

 * There is no problem, those edits were done by a friend of mine who got access to my account.

The matter is sorted, no reason to dispute now. Thanks for letting me know about those edits. Will make sure this does not happen again. Please refrain from adding those conversations on your talk page again. Thanks. Aadityaindu2004 (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IPhone OS 1 logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IPhone OS 1 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to IPhone (1st generation). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Those links are useful and provide information of the durability of the phone. Darius robin (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to IPhone (1st generation). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Still not appropriate for wikipedia. Natureium (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Can you read what I'm saying??? Darius robin (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to IPhone (1st generation). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Yes, and I explained that review videos are still not appropriate. '' Natureium (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

It's not a review video, it's a durability test vid which gives a better look at the durability of the phone and can really help readers. Darius robin (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at IPhone 7. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Natureium (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Please see guidelines on WP:EL. These links are not appropriate. Natureium (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to take action on the AIV request as I don't think it's within scope, but please stop adding these links and articulate why you think they are appropriate in the context of the WP:EL policy. It's best to have a discussion around this instead of forging on regardless. If you continue to add them despite the concerns raised the edits may become disruptive. NativeForeigner Talk 16:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I really don't think there's anything wrong with my edits. I just added relevant durability videos concerning each phone. I may be adding them from the same YouTube channel, but I'm not doing any paid editing or advertising. All I think is that these videos are very informative and helpful. That's all. Darius robin (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You are aware numerous users have pointed out that YouTube links in various smartphone articles are not appropriate. However, you persistently believe that you have the authority to deem what is useful in Wikipedia articles. If you don't know what is wrong with your edits, see the other comments made on your talk page. Guysayshi (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, if you want to remove them, it's fine, all I was doing is trying to help by adding an informative video. Darius robin (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your effort is appreciated, but please render help the right way. Thank you. Guysayshi (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Guysayshi

Your recent editing history at IPhone 6S shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Natureium (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * ?? I think the dispute is solved. Why are you warning me now? Darius robin (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

code talkers
Hi. Oiarzabal (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)You just reverted the edits I did on the Code Talkers Chapter on Basques. You believe the editd "did not appear constructive". Basically, by reverting my edits which pint out to an academic article that clearly debunks the myth of the so-called Basque code talkers, you are allowing the readers to be misinformed. --Oiarzabal (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You are expressing personal opinion. Wikipedia has to be neutral. Darius robin (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Well. I am quoting an academic article. Biased opinions are those that appear on the chapter. How can I modify something that never happens in rela life? Help me please Oiarzabal (talk) 15:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You could make some corrections and spelling fixes. Do that and someone else other than me will review it, let's see whether it's fine with them. Darius robin (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

iPhone X
You are rendering all of my changes as unconstructive vandalism as well. I am extremely upset that my changes to try to improve the grammar on one page were considered vandalism by you.

You are repeatedly adding wrong information to the article, with bad grammar as well as removing information without appropriate explanation. You tell me, how can that be acceptable?? Darius robin (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Actually I did not add any incorrect information at all, unless you can specifically point to something incorrect that I added. The only information I removed was the date when the iPhone X was supposed to be released. That date is obsolete because the phone has already been released. Please note that good-faith edits are not considered vandalism by Wikipedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at iPhone X, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZfJames (talk • contribs) 14:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note 8
Dude, what is your problem? You're behaving like a dictator by removing cited content that you disagree with for some obscure reason. 49.180.73.198 (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Wait. Looking at the discussions above appears to hint that you're some kind of control freak. Please desist behaving like a Nazi and give clear reasons why you oppose an edit, rather than obscure or petty excuses. 49.180.73.198 (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

No use replying to such a person. Darius robin (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * it's fine if you don't want to reply, but please don't start lying in your edit summaries. In you're latest removal you claimed the removed information was in the lead when it was actually in the history section. You don't own Wikipedia so stop trying to remove content that doesn't suit you by hook or crook. 49.180.128.77 (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Please at least try and put some effort into your excuses for removing my edit. Your claim of other competitors doesn't warrant removal of my edit, as my edit summary shows. Alternatively, you could admit that Wikipedia doesn't belong to you and just let my edit stand. 49.180.128.77 (talk) 06:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Vandal
what is your problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betimantha (talk • contribs) 09:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

You are vandalizing Wikipedia, I have no problem, just reverting your edits. Darius robin (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. dalahäst (let's talk!) 09:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The 3RR has exceptions, with one of them being vandalism reverts. See WP:3RRNO. Darius robin (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see any obvious vandalism going on here. Could you show me some diffs of what you're referring to? dalahäst (let's talk!) 09:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? Check properly, every single edit of theirs is blalant vandalism. Darius robin (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Surely this doesn't count as vandalism in your book? dalahäst (let's talk!) 09:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm talking in general. There may be very few exception, but almost all of them are vandalism. Darius robin (talk) 09:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

I've seen a couple personal attacks on your page, but nothing blatant besides that. Most of this seems to just involve placing and removing tables on sports-related pages. dalahäst (let's talk!) 09:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * And damaging templates a lot, as well as adding over 100,000 bytes to articles (that's not possible in such quick succession.

Now they have been blocked. I'm sure the admin is not so stupid to block them for no reason Darius robin (talk) 09:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a huge list of this user's alternate accounts here that I found in the report at WP:AIV. It would have been helpful if I'd known about it earlier, as I'm not familiar with the pages the user was editing and had no clue whether or not the tables were supposed to be there. They didn't look like vandalism to me (after all, tables of event results are common on sports-related pages), but they apparently are. dalahäst (let's talk!) 10:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I was going to tell you about that, but was busy reverting his edits. Darius robin (talk) 10:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

iPhone X
Hi Like to the iPhone 8+ who replaces 7+, X model replaces 7+ according to it sizes. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It is the successor to both the 7 and the 7 Plus. It just doesn't depend on sizes, you have to take internals into consideration as well. Darius robin (talk) 11:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Have you got a reliable source ? --Panam2014 (talk) 11:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Have you? Darius robin (talk) 11:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing have a reliable source for this. We should remove the information, like for iPad Pro. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe keeping both would make much more sense, as it is the successor to the iPhone 7 range. Darius robin (talk) 11:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * But have you got a source for this ? Perhaps X is a new line, like Air. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, then maybe it will be good to remove it. Darius robin (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * And we could restaure if we have a source. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Darius robin (talk) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Warning messages
Your addition of a warning for this edit to User talk:202.125.136.102 was over-the-top. The edit was not vandalism. It was possible self-promotion, it was unsourced, but it was not vandalism. I would strongly suggest you read what constitutes wp:vandalism. An would have been the correct choice for this. Perhaps with a mention of wp:listpeople and wp:notability (people) on the IP's talk page. An would also be a good choice. Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not give it to him for that one edit, I checked his contributions and saw that he had vandalized about 3 pages. Especially his edit to List of banks in India, where he wrote "Pagal Bank of India", that's when I checked the WP:WHOIS and sure enough, he was from Pakistan. And so, I gave him the Lv4 warning, for "political vandalism". Darius robin (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Before the February 17 edit on 2017-09-06, the next edit was three weeks prior on 2017-08-16, the edit before that was three months prior on 2017-05-03. IP warning should be reset after just a few days as some IP address are dynamic. The topic was different as well which suggests another editor. Which begs the question, why didn't Huggle reset between your warning on 2017-09-06 and today? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you check WHOIS now, you can still see the same location that I saw when I gave the warning, meaning, the IP has not been changed yet, and that it's still the same person. Darius robin (talk) 08:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The IP geolocation is unlikely to have changed. However, who it was assigned to can change. Sometimes never, occasionally, or even often as with the IP history here. See IP address. I would strongly recommend against a 4im warning except for very bad vandalism. Overt racist content, BLP vandalism, etc. Jim1138 (talk) 08:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

iPhone X
What someone decided on the talk page of another article doesn't nullify the need to discuss it on the talk page of the correct article. The iPhone X is a smartphone. If you can find 2 sources describing it as a phablet, I can find 2,000 describing it as a smartphone. I'm not going to try to remove it from the list of phablets because it's borderline whether or not it should qualify, so on an article about phablets, I'll leave it. This article, however, is about the iPhone X, which is described by nearly all reliable sources as a smartphone. Natureium (talk) 14:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You can't keep things on the "borderline" here. If you are changing it to smartphone, it has to be removed from the list of phablets. Actually even I disagree with it being called a phablet, but and  found a couple sources calling it a phablet. Darius robin (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * A couple of sources doesn't override thousands of sources. And if you want to remove it from the list of phablets, you can, but that reasoning doesn't make sense. Natureium (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Essential Phone
Hi Darius Robin,

Please stop with your addition of YouTube Links. Why do you choose JerryRigEverything for all your video links? Some of JerryRigEverything's videos include sponsorship to phone skins etc.

On WP:SPAM page, under the videos section: Adding links to online free videos that promote a site or product is not allowed...a video is a spamming video if: - "It has links on the video page—the page that plays the video—that go to a commercial site or to another spamming video, even if it is only one link among many legitimate links."

JerryRigEverything and other YouTubers often provide links in the description and even promote products within their videos. If you wish to add videos, can you please use the talk page and get some consensus first and not simply just put them in, because the phone material is special...etc.

Guysayshi 11:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Guysayshi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guysayshi (talk • contribs)
 * What to do about this?
 * Indeed, nothing wrong with linking a YouTube video on the article. It's the CONTENT of the link that matters. Guysayshi (talk) 11:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

By the way, use ~ to get an automatic signature in the end of your talk page comments. Darius robin (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've tried. But the thing just screws up by itself. Guysayshi (talk) 11:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Don’t put the part, I put that so that it doesn’t get executed when I’m showing it to you. Darius robin (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes I'm aware of that. Thanks for the advice. Guysayshi (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The default iOS 10 home screen layout as released by Apple.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The default iOS 10 home screen layout as released by Apple.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

S
Hi If s stood for "speed" for 3GS and "Siri" for 4S, who does means S for 5s and 6s ? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * How will I know? Darius robin (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * But does Apple not communicate this every year? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * They only did it for the first two iterations, not anymore. Darius robin (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Galaxy S8
Hi Is the Galaxy S8 a phablet ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The S8 is too small to be classified as a phablet. The Note 8 and S8+ are phablets, and the S8 is a smartphone. Darius robin (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * and S6 Edge, Edge+ and S7 Edge ? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * S6, S6 Edge, S7 and S8 are smartphones, while the S6 Edge+, S7 Edge and S8+ are phablets. Darius robin (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

iOS version history
Hello, I see that you again changed the minimum SoC required for HEIF/HEVC encoding to Apple A9 in the iOS version history article. This is incorrect, A10 is required, as is clearly stated in the source I provided: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2017/503/?time=1681 If, after reviewing the source you still disagree that A10 is required, please explain how you came to that conclusion on the article talk page instead of adding back incorrect information into the article. –Paul1337 (talk) 04:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, ok. Darius robin (talk) 10:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Google Pixel Buds page reverts
Pl avoid unnecessary reverts of the info that is important for any language translation service i.e. how many languages the service can translate and what all languages it can translate. I have put this on talk page of Google Pixel Buds as well. Pl avoid unnecessary reverts. Thanks. IndianGeneralist 09:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC).

Help
I am new to Wikipedia. As I inserted few links in Wikipedia article pages but that was removed by you. I know there will be some cause for this. My request is that can you please let me know why they have been deleted so that I can take car next time. Hope you reply. Your regards Banish
 * According to WP:RSSELF, you must never cite blog posts and articles written by yourself, so your edits were reported. Darius robin (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on IPhone 8. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

iPhone X
Things do not work that way. If Apple says (primary source) that it's a smartphone, and the secondary sources say it's a phablet, one must write that it's a phablet. Pretexts Apple's opinion or the absence of the term in the dictionary are not admissible arguments. It is time to put the term back. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * up. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, just don’t call it "phablet smartphone", but rather just "phablet". Darius robin (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. My proposition was to find a median solution, which was rejected. Your opinion is welcome in talk page. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup Final
Hello Darius robin. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup Final, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)