User talk:D4dog

Great Hockham
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Great Hockham, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://greathockham.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Great Hockham
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Great Hockham, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://greathockham.org/default.aspx, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Great Hockham and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Great Hockham with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Great Hockham.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Great Hockham/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Great Hockham saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. While you assert at the article's talk page that you are the webmaster of this site, I'm afraid that we will need external verification of this by one of the processes explained above. This is necessary because Wikipedia does not require identity verification at account creation. I'm sorry for the extra difficulties, and if you have any questions about the procedures, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem follow-up: Great Hockham
Dear D4dog:

Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above, the article has been deleted. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Communications Committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you may certainly do so at any point, and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As I mentioned above, since Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that GNU Free documentation license permits modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained. I realize that you have indicated at the article's talk page that the source is in public domain, but it still carries a notice indicating that it is "Copyright Great Hockham.Org 2008 All rights reserved."

If you have questions about the verification procedure, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Alternatively, you might address them at the talk page of the copyright policy, which is generally monitored by volunteers experienced in processing such matters. Thank you.--Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)