User talk:D6equj5

June 2013
Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bradford Factor because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Amit (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Bradford Factor Amit (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bradford Factor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bradford Factor was changed by D6equj5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861098 on 2013-06-02T19:38:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Bradford Factor. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Bradford Factor
'