User talk:DAAOEM91019

December 2016
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Chaos Ridden Years, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 18:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2016 in heavy metal music— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jus da  fax   23:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Afterwords (The Gathering album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

For all tid
Could you please provide a source for this edit? Best regards, Pajo   Pajimir  13:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Zhou Youguang and Gish
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Shade Empire. Sum mer PhD v2.0 23:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Vanamonde (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at DragonForce.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  13:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Into the Night World


The article Into the Night World has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:NALBUMS the sources include the group's official fan group, a stock image and a streaming of the album from loudwire with no review of the album a part from the phrase "an engaging effort". Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at No Grave But the Sea. Binksternet (talk) 05:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dream Theater. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 23:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello DAAOEM91019, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Milo Murphy's Law have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Two Steps from Hell
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Two Steps from Hell. However, with this edit, I note that you directly copied my edit summary to support your own addition. While I assume good faith in your edits, I would kindly request that you do not do this again, as an uninvolved editor may incorrectly assume that we are sockpuppets, which can cause unnecessary drama for the both of us. Hope you understand. Thanks. --  Alex TW 10:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at DragonForce.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  06:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Blind Guardian. Binksternet (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * DAAOEM91019 - You've been blocked numerous times for violating this policy. Because of this, you will need to appeal your block to an administrator and demonstrate that you understand and will comply with this policy before you will be able to continue editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)