User talk:DBC90119

April 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Trump Death Clock, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.   – NJD-DE (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

I have sources. I'm sorry you don't care enough to read them buddy. Perhaps you could redirect me to a different page where I could spread the truth? I've found that many articles on this site are biased against President Trump. This is hardly an accurate depiction of who is at fault for the events of 2020, it's mostly a result of many people on both sides. I will update the page later with details of the nursing home policies of Governors Newsom, Cuomo, and Whitmer to include more detail as to who is responsible for a large amount of the deaths. Thanks for the comment. DBC90119 (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, before you continue editing I recommend you to read WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. You may change the articles to depict a more accurate picture, as long as this is supported by reliable sources.
 * The edit you made on Trump Death Clock was not supported by reliable sources. The reference you gave mentioned Pelosi's visit to SF Chinatown. It didn't state anything about people saying that it would be unfair to blame the deaths on Trump when prominent politicians on the other side of the aisle have encouraged people to continue life as normal despite increasing knowledge about the risk of a pandemic. Drawing a connection between two things (here Pelosi's visit and unfairness of blaming deaths on Trump) without it being reported by reliable sources is considered original research, which Wikipedia articles must not contain. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

I think they are very important to compare. As you read the article you will learn Nancy encouraging people to visit Chinatown while saying the city had things under control. We later learned that was not true. There were about 30 cases on average per day according to the numbers I found online. Of course this is less than cities like New York but it is still significant. She wanted to have a party which was not a good thing to do in that time. Of course, later we learned she is a hypocrite and did not follow her own rules. You know it is unfair to blame the president for such a thing when he left it to local politicians to decide what to do. If there is anyone to blame it is the local politicians, not our president. DBC90119 (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

I have just read up on the page you sent me. After realizing that your reliable sources are mainstream media networks proven to be propaganda such as CNN and simply liars like the New York Times, I have decided to no longer use your platform. I encourage all who read this to do your research and do not simply follow any of the things you see on the news. You will only find the truth if you use reliable, primary sources with facts not opinions and bias from a person on one side of the story. DBC90119 (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)