User talk:DBD/Archive 15

June 2010 – January 2011

Prince consort
Yes, that's the one! --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -- &oelig; &trade; 22:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

British monarch categories
DBD, can we delete Category:Queens regnant of the United Kingdom? It is a small category with little room for expansion, since there are only two and the next four people in the line of succession are men. I'd like to move all the UK monarchs back into the singleCategory:Monarchs of the United Kingdom and add Victoria to Category:Queens regnant instead per WP:SMALLCAT. Thanks.DrKiernan (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine by me, mate DBD 17:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

template needing your help please
Template:Hereditary barons of England - Kittybrewster  &#9742;  08:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * One of them is linked! Kittybrewster  &#9742;  10:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There are now two English barony templates, one of which I created last night and is linked to each Barony. One needs deleting. There are other templates which are not linked to the relevant baronies (Scotland, Ireland and GB). Kittybrewster  &#9742;  11:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your templates need to be linked to something. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  21:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Geoffrey ... not quite Plantagenet...
I could deal with the title being named "Geoffrey (bishop)" or "Geoffrey (Archbishop of York)" but neither of the main sources used for Geoffrey's article call him "Geoffrey Plantagent". Both Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and the Handbook of British Chronology give his name as "Geoffrey" alone. Nor does Gillingham in Richard I call him Plantagenet and Warren's Henry II puts the Plantagenet in scare quotes. Might want to rethink the name for that article. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, fair point. The Naming conventions (clergy) suggest it should be at Geoffrey (bishop) then. Would you like to?DBD 22:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I never interupt a man on a roll! (grins) Ealdgyth - Talk 22:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Peer
Hi! Do you remember that, long time ago, I suggested creating an infobox for peers? Well, we now have Template:Infobox Peer... but's hideous! Unfortunatly, the user who created it thinks it's beautiful and considers Template:Infobox Royalty hideous, and I don't want to argue about that ( de gustibus non disputandum ). He agreed to make at least the title field similar to Infobox royalty's succession field. Unfortunatly, I can't do it no matter how much I tried. Could you try, please? The infobox could be quite useful in so many articles, but it's currently too ugly for me to look at. The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

E. F. Benson
Hi - I notice that a few weeks ago you moved Edward Frederic Benson to Edward Benson (writer). I just wanted to let you know that I've proposed a further move, to E. F. Benson over redirect. I've left a rationale at Talk:Edward Benson (writer). As you were involved in a recent naming decision, I wanted to ensure you had the chance to comment if you felt strongly about it. Regards, Ka renjc 18:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Cosmo Gordon Lang
Please do not move articles without discussing the potential move at the article's talk page first. Cosmo Gordon Lang is aFeatured Article and represents some of Wikipedia's best and most carefully reviewed work. Thanks, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok. So I was bold (i.e. I did nothing wrong), you reverted, so now let's discuss DBD 16:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

John Morton (bishop)
Hi. I don't understand the reasoning behind moving Morton from (archbishop) to (bishop), bearing in mind that he is much better known as Archbishop of Canterbury. I don't see anything in the naming conventions to support this. Deb (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

(Princess) Henrietta (Anne) of England
I would appreciate your opinion about the proper name of (Princess) Henrietta (Anne) of England, see Talk:Princess Henrietta of England JdH (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies is now a Feature article nominee
Hi! Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies has been nominated as possible Featured article. She was an Italian princess and the wife of Emperor Pedro II of Brazil. If're interested on reviewing and voting in favor or not of it, please go to Featured article candidates/Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies/archive1. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Casualty series
Template:Casualty series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks for deletion
The article List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Half Price  22:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

HM The Queen listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Queen. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Queenredirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kittybrewster  &#9742;  20:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)