User talk:DC124

February 2017
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cold Water (song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * If you have sources, please provide them. Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 123.136.111.19 (talk) 03:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Where Are Ü Now— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Where Are Ü Now. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acebulf (talk) 22:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 113.210.66.196 (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. 183.171.113.33 (talk) 03:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Where Are Ü Now. Binksternet (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

You mentioned "the main writer", which suggests that there are secondary writers on this account. Standard practice on Wikipedia is to place new posts at the bottom for proper flow. 331dot (talk) 01:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The "new posts at the bottom" comment referred to talk pages such as this one, where doing so makes it far easier to read a conversation. I'll also note (though that's not the reason for your block) that Wikipedia content should neutrally summarize what reliable sources have reported; if Nick Kibler is the "main writer" of Where Are Ü Now, I couldn't find a source for that, and you didn't provide one. Huon (talk) 02:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * You should not post multiple unblock requests, so I have merged the two. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This is getting out of hand. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ad Orientem is a bitch. #sick DC124 (talk) ——}

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)