User talk:DCPlatt

Hi. Sounds like a fun game, but it has to have a level of notability. You might wish to take a look at WP:MADEUP to see what I mean. Have fun! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The only relevant Google hit back to this game, or at least your version of it, is your article. Please don't recreate it. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, DC. This simply doesn't ring the bell. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I'm afraid this isn't the way to channel it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Again, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but two coincidental Google hits still don't make this notable.

Of course, you could always create a userpage for yourself and put the rules there as a small part of the page...but you didn't hear that from me. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Nope; Facebook isn't considered a third-party source. Nice try, though. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Nope again. :) Sneak a peek at WP:NOTABILITY to see what I mean.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

No sweat:

The Blowdart Game is a game in which players use an imaginary blowdart gun (consisting of a player holding their hands to their mouth like a blowdart gun) to blow a dart at another player (the victim). Once hit with the imaginary dart, the victim must immediately feign as if they have feinted (usually falling straight to the ground) and cannot speak or move until another player removes the imaginary dart from the victim's neck.

[[File: ]]

Rules
The rules of the game are as follows:
 * A player is only considered hit with the dart if he makes eye-contact with the shooter while the shooter is shooting
 * The shooter must bring a hand to their mouth as though they are holding a blowdart gun and make a defined shooting noise (a breathy "thooo" will suffice) aimed towards the victim with whom they have made eye contact
 * The victim must lie immobile until someone else pulls out the "dart"
 * Anyone can play, but if someone breaks a rule, they cannot play the game ever again

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Keith-ArmsFolded.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Keith-ArmsFolded.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Vince offer.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Vince offer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Vince offer.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Vince offer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)