User talk:DCenci23

December 2010
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chiropractic. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Consensus is that the Ernst study is reliable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chiropractic, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Chiropractic. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)