User talk:DD145HHH

April 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DrKay (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 13:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC) I'm so sorry. I let my so use my laptop and he though it would be funny which its not. I feel so bad. I need to edit a page about my company.

I'm so sorry. I let my so use my laptop and he though it would be funny which its not. I feel so bad. I need to edit a page about my company.

User: DD145HHH 13:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

stop User: DD145HHH 14:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

please unban me. my son messed around with my laptop. User: DD145HHH 14:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Provide your appropriate reasons and place a Template. Dam222  🌋 (talk) 14:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello DD145HHH. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DD145HHH. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay. i did not edit. my son edited. User: DD145HHH 15:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Follow up on UTRS ticket
To follow up on our discussion via UTRS, your best approach will be to create a new account and indicate that it replaces this account. There's less helpful information here than I'd hoped. Most of the other information I found was about a possible compromised account and stopping the disruption. That's not the problem here. As you say you need to edit your company's article for work, please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Sorry, I could not be more helpful. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * if i get fired from my job cause of this i will sue. my son made a stupid mistake and you guys are so not understanding User: DD145HHH 16:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. DrKay (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

is now closed. User has not withdrawn the legal threat. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)