User talk:DDM1

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Please refrain from editing in such a Fashion. Thanks, and Happy Editing. '' Rttam (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Deep cut
I added some more to the Deep Cut article but wonder if it should be re-named Deep cut (play) to avoid confusion what do you think?  Teapot  george Talk  22:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Content
I gave you an option around justifying inclusion in the article, you chose not to do that and just force in the material anyway. I remain unconvinced that the play merits mention in the article about the barracs. It certainly does not deserve a subsection and anything more than a one line reference, cross linking to the article about the play.

With respect to Private Eye, selective block quoting has no place in the article. It's reasonable to mention their criticism of the investigations, but I'd also avoid lending it undue weight. Matrix Chambers are no friend of the government, present or past, and the implication by overplaying the Private Eye article that it participated in some kind of cover up is misplaced.

ALR (talk) 07:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)