User talk:DHolman630

December 2018
Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Snake Eyes (G.I. Joe)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daniel Holman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Romantic orientation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Snotter. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This user's short contribution history is full of vandalism.  Esowteric + Talk  18:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Holman
Hello DHolman630,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Holman for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Daniel_Holman&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. The sole purpose of this account appears to be disruptive editing and vandalism.  Esowteric + Talk  12:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 12:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

What constructive contributions do you want to make? If you knew it was stupid to mess around, why did you do it? 331dot (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)