User talk:DJCAMBRIDGE

Notability of Mykill miers
A tag has been placed on Mykill miers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page It's Been A Long Time Coming has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wfjrpydqzli/sicrhkyqlpi/aaaaaaaabbe/caj4_x3xe1i/s400/41cgnzmqf1l__ss500_.jpg). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wfjrpydqzli/sicrhkyqlpi/aaaaaaaabbe/caj4_x3xe1i/s400/41cgnzmqf1l__ss500_.jpg). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Second Coming (Album)
A tag has been placed on The Second Coming (Album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- Menti  fisto  02:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mykill miers
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mykill miers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mykill miers. Thank you. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

The Trials Of Job
A tag has been placed on The Trials Of Job, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 02:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyrights
Now that you've been properluy welcomed, I'd like to point out that one of the issues that Wikipedia takes very seriously is copyright violation. It appears that much of the material has been copied from other web sites, several of which have copyright notices on them. Please remove this content (others might take the initiative and remove it proactively) and replace it with material non-copyrighted material. This may include a summary of factual information that you have gathered and put together in your own words. Thank you. -- Tcncv (talk) 02:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you still there?
I apologize on behalf of the Wikipedia community for your initial bad experience trying to create the Mykill Miers article and the related album. As a new editor, it can sometimes be easy to run afoul with Wikipedia's policies and unfortunately, the response is sometimes unduly harsh, and often give someone such as yourself insufficient time to properly respond.

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is a target of much vandalism and vanity editing, and those who patrol for and revert such activity often must make quick decisions and move on without taking the time to gather all of the facts. However, in defense of the actions, I'd like to point out that of all the policies and guidelines that drive Wikipedia, copyright infringement is one of the two that Wikipedia takes very seriously (the other being unsourced controversial information in biographies of living persons). It is unacceptable to copy information from a copyrighted source and paste it into a Wikipedia article. That is the primary reason that your article was deleted. (I would have preferred to see the offending edits rolled back, allowing you to continue your work, but the other editor elected a different option.)

I for one believe you were making a good faith effort to add useful content to Wikipedia, which should be applauded. A simple google search for Mykill Miers appears to show that (in my opinion) there is more than enough coverage of him and his works, such as this article to satisfy the the Wikipedia's policies for notoriety. I hope you return. If you do, I will be more than happy to assist you in recreating the articles which were deleted. One suggestion when starting articles - get some references ready and insert them into the article early on to avoid having the articles tagged and processed for speedy deletion a second time.

Thank you. -- Tcncv (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I hope I didn't "bite" you when I deleted the copyright violation. It's as Tcncv just said; the sheer volume of copyright violations and real vandalism we delete on a daily basis is staggering and misunderstandings sometimes happen.  Your original contributions are welcomed and appreciated.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)