User talk:DJWhale

Hello
Most of your edits have been reverted. Please read the edit summaries. If you have any questions I assume everyone involved would be happy to answer them. Please do not hesitate to ask. At this time, you have made several edits without using sources, shown an understanding of the topic area that the average user would not have, and use a user name similar to another problematic editor who had ties with SSCS. If you are just a concerned person who wishes to assist the project that is Wikipedia then good on you. However, any shenanigans will easily be dealt with. The best way to make sure that it isn't even an issue is by staying neutral (only using information from proper secondary and neutral sources, not trying to make a point, and so on) Cptnono (talk) 11:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * SSCS is not RS. Stop using them as a source. Also watch your bias. Do not mark edits as minor when they are adding/removing content. You have made it clear that you are having a hard time staying neutral. Your effort to format your sentences is appreciated but that is not enough for inclusion. Cptnono (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't find any consensus that SSCS is not a reliable source. It is often used as a primary source, but it entirely acceptable to use primary sources. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society operations, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)