User talk:DJ Autagirl

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Wikipedia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wikipedia was changed by DJ Autagirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876179 on 2013-07-30T07:18:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 07:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 07:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bull Terrier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bull Terrier was changed by DJ Autagirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86909 on 2014-09-18T02:15:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DJ Autagirl/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:DJ_Autagirl/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:DJ_Autagirl/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 18:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Nuce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

AFD
Hi DJ Autagirl, Before nominating articles editors are expected to follow WP:BEFORE and look for sources ... which judging by these AFDs you clearly haven't done so so I've closed them all as Speedy Keep, In future please read WP:AFD and follow WP:BEFORE before renominating any articles, Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also you should read this as AFD isn't for clean up solutions either. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Please also read WP:AFDHOWTO. It comes across as devious that you chose to leave no edit summary at all when nominating these pages for deletion, rather than the recommended "AfD: Nominated for deletion...".
 * Please explain how no edit summary implies deviousness. DJ Autagirl (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If other users have added a file to their watchlist, they are entitled to expect major proposals – such as nomination for deletion – to be described explicitly in the edit summary. That is why the HOWTO page recommends this practice. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * In these cases, it would have been better to propose merger/redirect to a list of characters, not outright deletion. See mergeto.
 * Moreover, in several cases you remvoved the DISPLAYTITLE template for no apparent reason. Perhaps you wanted to re-use the braces? An easy way to insert a fresh set is by clicking on –  in the Wiki markup panel below the edit window. If you don't see this panel, click on the "Insert" pop-up menu bar and change it to Wiki markup. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic  L ondon 13:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of programs broadcast by Hungama TV. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  11:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of programs broadcast by Hungama TV. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁  &#123;Talk&#125;   &#9809;  14:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Jack Gordon, you may be blocked from editing. Eteethan (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Low-rise (fashion), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ''Stop mass AfDing things with the same reason. You've been warned about disruptive behaviour before. Take a minute and carefully look at the article you're about to nominate, check for sources, and then proceed to create a nomination for deletion based off of the article. Don't nominate as "fancruft" with "no real world coverage" and then not explain the relevance of those to the article.'' Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 07:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Final warning
This is your final warning. Stop creating AfDs for characters without first checking to see if a merge is within the realm of possibility. There's no way that you couldn't have known that this is the proper way to do things, after you received a warning from Davey2010 over this very topic. If you had researched the characters or pages, you would have seen that the list of characters page for the Series of Unfortunate Events series has a long history of successful merge proposals. Given that you were given this warning via your talk page and several people pointed this out at the AfDs for the Matrix characters, there's no way that you wouldn't be aware that you have to do proper WP:BEFORE.

I would like to request that you not AfD any other character pages for the time being and that you instead work on learning policy a bit more. You've made less than 300 edits and so far you aren't really showing that you really understand policy or that you're listening to what people are saying to you. If you make another round of nominations like this one, you run a very strong risk of getting blocked from editing as a disruptive editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Initially I was just going to warn you, but a look shows that you've opened a whopping 26 pages for characters without doing WP:BEFORE. Some of these were done prior to the warning by Davey, but most of them were not. This made me think that you likely wouldn't pay any attention to my final warning and you've already been given more than enough notice to know that you should look into merging first. This is only a short block, but I do need to make sure that you understand that you need to follow policy. Before nominating any further character pages for AfD, first make sure that merging isn't an option. It's rare that a character in an extremely notable, long running series of any type (film, book, TV, etc) will not merit a list page for characters. In these AfDs merging is almost always the end result, so it saves more time and energy to open up a merge request. Only if there's actual pushback should you open an AfD. Claiming that you believe that there will be opposition is not a truly valid reason unless you can show some sort of proof that this would be the case, which I don't see that you've ever actually done. Once the 48 hours block is up you can resume editing, but I would strongly recommend that you not nominate any further characters for AfD for the time being. Use merge discussions first, especially since I don't really see that you have a firm grasp of policy as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I 100% support s block - You've had the best part of 3 months to read and understand the whole AFD and Merge process....- If you don't understand it then you ask someone .... You don't ignore the warnings and advice and just carry on regardless!,
 * It obviously goes without saying If you repeat the above after your 48hr block then you'll probably be blocked indefinitely without hesitation so unless you wanna be blocked I strongly suggest you do a bit of reading.... – Davey 2010 Talk 15:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mondo TV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 00:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kath Soucie. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * IMDb is not considered a reliable source, particularly for WP:BLP articles and even more so for personal data. I'm not issuing you another warning because at least you provided an edit summary, but don't re-add the DOB into the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation warning - Fangusu
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Fangusu. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:DJ Autagirl/sandbox


Hello, DJ Autagirl. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of In Nuce


A tag has been placed on In Nuce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/In Nuce (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)