User talk:DK201/Neonatal hypocalcemia

This is where the peer review feedback for DK201's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the main article isn't well detailed but the classmate shows enough data to add.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Half of the written information is touched on but yes, the details can be improved.

GeoMedrek (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the current article appears due for supplemental information, and this new content would fit in nicely to present unbiased information ot the reader.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Perhaps the risk factors for neonatal hypocalcemia, which are already laid out, could be expounded upon (how they tie into the development of hypocalcemia, etc.)?

Pdietry (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)