User talk:DL6443/Archive 2

December 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 18:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for unblock on 27 December 2016

 * I think you'll need to comment on what you will contribute if unblocked. I also can't quite tell whether you understand why your conduct was disruptive; if you don't, it seems likely that you'll run into the same problems again on other topics. Huon (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. I've edited the unblock appeal. SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Coffee, any objections? I'm inclined to unblock. Huon (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have two questions. Number one: Why don't you post on Coffee's talk page? Number two: If you are an administrator, why didn't you just unblock me? SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * One, because it's helpful to keep the conversation in one place. And two, because discussing an unblock with the blocking admin is somewhere between a suggested courtesy and a requirement, particularly in non-obvious cases. Huon (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * But then I'll keep receiving unnecessary notifications every time you or Coffee posts on my talk page! SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * My intuition says no on this one. (The final line on his unblock request isn't comforting either.) &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have fixed my unblock appeal. Surely now it is comforting, isn't it? SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * By the way, I think everyone deserves a second chance. SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
DAJF (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * SlitherioFan2016, I've blocked your sock account along with the IPs you've been using to edit anonymously. You may not, in any way, edit the project until you clear the block on this main account. Deceptive actions like this make it very unlikely that even a "standard offer" will be accepted in the future. Kuru   (talk)  11:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * How do I contribute constructively, though? SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You do not. You are not welcome to edit here, with out without an account. Kuru   (talk)  20:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've looked back at several of your target articles. It appears you've edited with 17 different IPs in the last week, and managed to get blocked 16 times causing several of the articles to be placed in protection. That's amazing. Given that the blocks are for harassment and simple vandalism, it would be fair to say you've used up a large allotment of second chances. Kuru   (talk)  21:17, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That wasn't my doing. I am (in the words of Betty Logan) "an SPA whose sole agenda is altering the color schemes at content ratings articles such as "SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Request for unblock on 10 January 2017

 * Now Yamla, I DO have an intention of following Wikipedia's guidelines. However nyou are right on the fact that I was caught commiting WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, and I think the block is suitable, but I just think being indeffed is a bit too "harsh"! If unblocked I will make lots and lots of useful contributions! --SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Great. You can demonstrate that by staying away, making zero edits, for the next six months and then applying under WP:SO. --Yamla (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Why six? Why not three? SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Six months is a minimum under WP:SO. You've been wildly abusive in your time here, so your only hope is to wait six months and then clearly show that you wouldn't repeat any of your behaviour so far. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Help me
I don't mean to interrupt my six months of zilch-editing, but I have a question. What happens if my WP:SO is rejected? Do I just wait another 6 months? Am I banned forever? What do I do if my standard offer gets rejected in July? SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If the SO is rejected, you can attempt it again six months later. Beyond that, your final level of appeal is the Arbitration Committee. Note that the SO clock resets from the message above; you may not now request an unblock under the Standard Offer until July 18th, 2017. Yunshui 雲 水 11:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry I am doing it again, but i want to ask how I ask at the ArbCom. SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You can contact ArbCom via email. The email address is arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Huon (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

The timer resets due to this edit. --Yamla (talk) 12:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you please 30-500 my talk page for 6 months? I know I reset it again, but I don't want to do it yet again. SlitherioFan2016 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)