User talk:DMKR2005

Maestro2016
Hi, thanks for your email. I'm afraid it went to my Junk, hence the late reply. I've been taking a bit of a break from Wikipedia, but I will try to have a look at Maestro2016. Merlinme (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This edit is very suspicious: Lots of plausible sounding text, but I've checked a couple of the sources and they're definitely misleading. E.g. "Workers in the textile industry, for example, earned more in Bengal and Mysore than they did in Britain, while agricultural labour in Britain had to work longer hours to earn the same amount as in Mysore." Reference says "earnings were comparable" for Bengal and Britain, doesn't say anything about Mysore, doesn't say anything about hours.
 * Again: "According to evidence cited by the economic historians Immanuel Wallerstein, Irfan Habib, Percival Spear, and Ashok Desai, per-capita agricultural output and standards of consumption in 17th-century Mughal India was higher than in 17th-century Europe and early 20th-century British India." Reference says per capita output was "certainly not lower and probably higher than contemporary European." Also note the way a bunch of names get thrown in. The reference is Suneja; Suneja references Wallerstein, saying Wallerstein cites Habib, Spear, Desai. Blinding with a blizzard of indirectly quoted sources is very Jagged_85. Merlinme (talk) 15:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I have also received your email and just wanted to let you know that several of us have been slowly backing this stuff out as we come across it. I'm not sure why we didn't revert it when it was first introduced, probably WP:AGF. With time it has become clear that these were not necessarily good contributions. ~Kvng (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DMKR2005 (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I was suspicious of the edits to History of radio three years ago, but no-one else seemed interested. To me, it was that they just had way too much detail compared to the rest of the article. I suspect that is true for some other edits, too, but didn't try to track them down. Gah4 (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks @Gah4. I was quite suspicious as well, after seeing all the peacock terms in MOSFET and related articles. Once I started cleaning up after Maestro, seeing his edits closely, i was pretty convinced that he is in fact Jagged 85. Now it is established. DMKR2005 (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks @Gah4. I was quite suspicious as well, after seeing all the peacock terms in MOSFET and related articles. Once I started cleaning up after Maestro, seeing his edits closely, i was pretty convinced that he is in fact Jagged 85. Now it is established. DMKR2005 (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Opened sockpuppet investigation
Sockpuppet_investigations/Jagged_85 Feel free to chip in if you want to. Merlinme (talk) 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

MOSFET spam
Thanks for working on some of the Atalla & Kahng spam. There's a ton of it. Dicklyon (talk) 03:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2022

 * Hello @Wikipelli.This article was heavily eddied by @Maestro2016 who was shown to be a sock puppet of Jagged 85, a well known vandal. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Jagged 85, Requests for comment/Jagged 85 and Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jagged 85. DMKR2005 (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Noted.. Thank you! Wikipelli Talk  23:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)