User talk:DON096343

A tag has been placed on Nelson milbach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. szyslak 04:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nelson milbach
A tag has been placed on Nelson milbach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 19:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Icestorm815 (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Curry, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Curry was changed by DON096343 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951257 on 2011-03-21T16:17:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Mouse constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Wikipelli  Talk   16:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Brown. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Wikipelli  Talk   16:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kansas Jayhawks.  Wikipelli  Talk   16:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kansas Jayhawks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kansas Jayhawks was changed by DON096343 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949085 on 2011-03-22T18:19:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Height. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Harry (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)