User talk:DSDRW

June 2021
Hello. Your recent edit to List of web awards appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. POLITANVM talk 13:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi! Thank you for bringing this to my attention! I will start looking for sources and see if I can create a standalone page to start. - DSDRW (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That sounds great. Make sure to read through WP:NOTABILITY before doing too much work on a new article that may not meet the notability guidelines. POLITANVM  talk 16:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Will do! Thanks again! Oh, by the way. Can I consult you if I have any questions or clarifications? DSDRW (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure! Another helpful resource would be Help:Your first article, if you haven’t already come across it. POLITANVM  talk 18:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello DSDRW. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DSDRW. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi! Is this about the SEMrush edit? I am not connected to them nor paid to write or mention their brand. I just happen to use the platform myself as I write blogs and do basic keyword research. That's why I'm familiar with the features. Please let me know how you'd like me to edit, so I can improve on my Wikipedia contributions. Thank you! DSDRW (talk) 17:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DesignRush (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DesignRush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:DesignRush Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:DesignRush reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DesignRush


A tag has been placed on Draft:DesignRush, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CNMall41 (talk) 04:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)