User talk:DTH89/Archive 1

TheOldJacobite
You should know about TheOldJacobite. He has a history of removing "minor" characters and character descriptions in various articles, including Die Hard and it's sequels, Armageddon and such, forcibly removing them based on his own personal preference and at times acts like he owns those articles, which he doesn't. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed he does, he seems to be set in the ways of sticking to what "reliable sources" say and removing any and all "minor characters" as he has done with me previously, which is annoying at times. Even though he claims Wikipedia is not IMDb, he has a responsibility as a editor to make Wikipedia as encyclopaedic as possible. But obviously, we're not here to start arguments on talk pages, so can you and OldJacobite make an agreement already? I have no idea what kind of common ground you two are on, but please do remember edit warring is disruptive and a pain to other editors.---Ducktech89 (talk)
 * Let's just say he refuses to listen to reason to me and some of the other editors and that he and I have been clashing with each other since we had argument over these issues in Die Hard 2 and we did so again in Armageddon. He still sticks to his own beliefs and relentless keeps removing things that are deemed encyclopedic. That's my issues with him. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've had similar problems, and at one point got very annoyed at him when he seemed to be deliberately reverting all my edits on Pulp Fiction for kicks. We discussed and came to an agreement, but he has very recently removed my edits to Die Hard with a Vengeance and A Good Day to Die Hard for similar reasons of "minor characters". But all characters got equal amounts of screen time in a film and we're all considered "major characters", would that make the "minor characters shouldn't be mentioned argument" redundant? ---Ducktech89 (talk)
 * If you want to discuss what's best and encyclopedic for film articles, go to WP:FILM and MOS:FILM for them. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Really your choice now how you handle the situation, Id suggest reaching a consensus with him as I have previously and to stop engaging in this little "war". Thanks for your messages. ---Ducktech89 (talk)
 * I noticed that TheOldJacobite hasn't edit anything since last October due to a block and dispute. What do you think? BattleshipMan (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Not too sure mate, I haven't had much to do with him ever since the Die Hard cast thing. I've moved over to editing wrestling pages so I didn't even know that he stopped editing to be honest. I mean, there are many scenarios I can think of why he ceased editing, for one he seemed to be getting into constant disputes and edit wars, so I get that can be annoying and can really break someone's spirit. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Training Day
Not sure I am quite getting the large deletions on Training Day without comment. Is this something you could have done with cite template requests before full deletion. JohnWickTwo (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah sorry mate, I was gonna make a new Alonzo Harris page after thinking it was weird that it was joined on to the actual Training Day article. But then I had a look at the old deletion logs and found out and just found it was voted to be merged into the Training Day article, so I just decided to leave it. Sorry, that's my bad, probs should have looked into before. D'oh.


 * I saw you removed all the award nominations from the Sheen article without an edit summary. Are they listed elsewhere? Enigmamsg 09:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Replaced awards section on the Sheen page with link to List of awards and nominations received by Martin Sheen.

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Curt Hawkins ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Curt_Hawkins check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Curt_Hawkins?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Intercontinental Championship
 * Zack Ryder ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Zack_Ryder check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Zack_Ryder?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Intercontinental Championship

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Ducktech89. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ADucktech89 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thank you. I will use this feature wisely to the best of my abilities. Have a good one

February 2019
Hello there,

I saw some your edits on Dean Ambrose while I was blocked for a few days. I did not really get how the information you added are necessary. Wikipedia is a place for the general audience and things that are known only to wrestling fans and are out of context to wrestling fans should not be included. Also, please don't use unreliable sources such as Online World of Wrestling according to WP:PW/Sources. Please be collaborative and reach for consensus.  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 13:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

- Was unaware OWOW was unreliable. Apologies, feel free to revert. Thanks for pointing out.

Individual reassessment
Triple H, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 17:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Matt Hardy, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 02:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Pro Wrestling Wikiproject
Judging that you help out on the wrestling articles around here, I would like to invite you to watchlist WT:PW. That is where centralised discussion for professional wrestling articles take place. You will also want to check out and watchlist WP:PW/RS and WikiProject Professional wrestling/Article alerts. Happy editing. StaticVapor message me!   07:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation
Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Miz revert
Sorry I reverted your edit on The Miz without a edit summary, it was a missclick. I do not think the heading change you made was an accurate descriptor of the section. "Brand switches" or stuff like "Raw" or "Smackdown" does not describe what content is in a section. As well as, he was involved in two major feuds not various feuds as you changed it to. StaticVapor message me!   05:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:REDLINK
Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapor message me!   17:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Also it is WP:SYNTH and WP:CRYSTAL, to say he has a singles match against an unnamed opponent. The source does not say it will be a singles match (obviously it probably will be, but we should wait and see). StaticVapor message me!   17:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Dynamic dates
Hello. Please don't put dynamic dates for subscriber numbers for YouTubers, etc. The stats don't update automatically so it is wrong to have the date update when the numbers themselves are likely older. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 02:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seth Rollins
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seth Rollins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seth Rollins
The article Seth Rollins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Seth Rollins for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * - Could you fix the unsourced information for the article before I continue the review? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I will try my best to fix them ASAP, but I am currently doing some things IRL that may slow my progress down. Cheers, Ducktech89
 * Should be good now, Ducktech89

No problem. I'll check it out soon. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seth Rollins
The article Seth Rollins you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Seth Rollins for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Braindead-1992-album.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Braindead-1992-album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Cover art for film soundtracks
Please review MOS:FILM. Generally cover art for film soundtracks should not be included in film articles. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion
Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=910499211&diff=prev reverted] my fix to G1 Climax 29.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both  and one or more   referring to it. Someone then removed the  but left the , which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining  with a copy of the  ; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add  to your talk page.

Harassment and Seth Rollins
"Do some goddamn research"

- User talk:Ducktech89

Well, I will try to be the bigger person here and talk this out rationally (maybe you can return the favor but I won't hold my breath). You claim "it made fans boo him at the main event of SummerSlam and cheer Brock" when that's simply not true. Let's look at the facts:

1. SummerSlam (2019) took place in Canada. 2. Canadians love cheering for fellow Canadians because of pride. 3. Brock Lesnar has resided in Saskatchewan, Canada since at least 2016, possibly even longer.

But no, you're correct some "Twitter drama" made them boo him. It's a small minority of dedicated fans that even cared about those posts in a negative light. If Twitter drama constitutes "Controversy" then maybe you want to update Ariya Daivari's page and mention that he called a fan a "biitch (two I's for being extra bitchy" on Twitter and stirred up massive controversy for dissing White Claw. It even says so in the source. Both examples do not belong on Wikipedia because they are irrelevant and unimportant.

M A R I O Fan78 21:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Alright, I was being an asshole and I apologise for the rude remarks. But I feel that this section is notable. SummerSlam may be a bad example, but Rollins was also condemned on the preceding episodes of Raw by Alvarez and Meltzer who commented that he sounded like a geek who was trying to be cool when he did the DX thing, as well as how he came off as weak after being attacked constantly by Lesnar. This closer scrutiny of his character is most likely due to his new "yes-man" status, which caused many people to turn on him. I believe that it did have a negative impact on his persona when both reputable sources and fans alike were ragging on him, not Roman Reigns bad, but I feel like it is notable enough to be mentioned. This sources could also easily be added.

Also, his Twitter beef with Ospreay is notable because it is rare that we see two wrestlers having a feud outside on social media outside of a worked angle. It's at least worth mentioning in the personal life section.

Again, I wholeheartedly apologise for the rude comments and admit that I was being a dickhead. I hope we can find a comprise for this as my intentions were not malicious or trying to step on any toes, but I feel these instances meet the notability guidelines. I look forward to having more mature conversations in the future. Thanks. Ducktech89 11 September 2019, 8:31 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Invitation
You are invited to this section of MOS:FILM about the issues with the format of 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:David Finlay III


Hello, Ducktech89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Finlay III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj  (📧) 04:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Rock
Hi, Much Love as a friend, Can you please tell them that it really is true that The Rock really did that day, appear on The Kelly Clarkson show, as Kelly Clarkson herself and The Kelly Clarkson show on Instagram and Twitter and Facebook all confirmed as did TMZ as did Kevin Hart himself all did confirm Vouching for The Rock as The Rock sent Kevin Hart a Text message offering to fill in for him, Kevin Hart as Kevin Hart was supposed to appear but didn't because of the accident the weekend a few days before it actually aired when Rock called and Texted Hart and offered to fill in for Hart, please? &#91;&#91;Telley&#93;&#93; (talk) 19:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Invitation
You are invited to WP:FILM about the issue of formats that started on 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Jon Moxley
Hey, Jon Moxley was just ranked #1 for Wrestler of the year by sports illustrated. Iqbal724 (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Cool. I'll be sure to add to his page if it's not already there. Ducktech89 2:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Misawa edits reversion
I've noticed that you just reverted edits I've made today to the Mitsuharu Misawa page. Assuming nothing but good faith, of course, but I can't find an explanation; is there a particular reason? (I understand if some of my additions are excessive, and I am willing to accept criticisms of a lack of focus or brevity, but I also made a couple necessary corrections today, such as one regarding the match which was the retirement match for referee Joe Higuchi.) TarkovskyFanX957 (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

It was a misclick, apologies. I have no problem with your edits, I was just scrolling through the edit history and must have accidentally rollbacked. I will revert it back now. Ducktech89 (talk) 02:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)