User talk:DVD206/Archive 1

February 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. - Altenmann >t 01:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A note on inverse problem for effective resistances
A tag has been placed on A note on inverse problem for effective resistances requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Altenmann >t 08:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I found A note on inverse problem for effective resistances not to be as lacking in context as the speedy-deletion proposal suggests, and I found the content to be of interest. Unlike many mathematics articles, you can understand the problem just by reading a tiny bit of the beginning of the article.  However, it may be original research, in which case it should be deleted under the relevant policy.  And if it's not original research, it would need to be rewritten in a way that complies with Wikipedia usages, including citing the literature, informing the lay reader at the outset what the subject area is, identifying the author only in the edit history, etc.  Frankly, I think it should have been "prodded" rather than speedily deleted on lack-of-context grounds. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trigonometry circulant


The article Trigonometry circulant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTTEXTBOOK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 23:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Trigonometry circulant
I have nominated Trigonometry circulant, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Trigonometry circulant. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Warning
All your edits of wikipedia articles appear to be disruptive. Please explain yourself, otherwise the account may be blocked from editing. - Altenmann >t 21:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix


The article A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Overly specific essay without application to a general encyclopedia audience

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. gnfnrf (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Your articles
You should understand that Wikipedia is a general purpose encyclopedia; it is not a place to publish mathematical proofs or theories, except to explain notable mathematical concepts to a general audience. If you continue to add inappropriate articles to Wikipedia, they will continue to be removed. gnfnrf (talk) 17:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I've moved your article to User:Daviddaved/A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix where you can continue to work on it in (relative) peace. Wikipedia is not a place for "original research", but as long as you work in your userspace ("User:Daviddaved/...") you're not likely to be bothered.

CRGreathouse (t | c) 06:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Disagreed. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for original math research. - Altenmann >t 07:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to add that removing the AfD tag will NOT halt the AfD process. Reyk  YO!  01:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with A trigonometric identity for a circulant matrix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)