User talk:DX-MON/Archive 1

PokeBattlers
Why do you think we are attacking you guys or something? We are just doing our jobs as Wikipedia editors and New Page Patrollers.

And whether it is an A7 or not, again, it does not meet the general notability requirements of Wikipedia.

--Mooshykris (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I was not thinking that you were *attacking* us, I was debating via "call and recall", or more simply put: one side puts forth one argument, then the other another. I am simply defending an article that is still un-developed and I feel is to be terminated before it has even had a chance to become even a Foetus of an article. May *I* quote *you* what that an encyclopedia is: A book or set of documents that define/list what things are. The article is simply created (and is still a work in progress) on the basis that it is telling people what PokéBattlers is, and what it's authors (currently) feel are it's most prominant features - just as an encyclopedia on paper would. I was telling you (and helping to correct you as a contributor would anyway) about what the *true* definition of Software is, and hence that the article cannot fall under A7 (which was the original basis for deletion and is what should still be the basis, so people have gone off toppic). If you're a "New Page Patroler", which I don't doubt you are, I ask you that you give the article at least 30 minutes more life before you just simply flag it for deletion. DX-MON (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * There is no "bias" involved in this. It has been said multiple times by multiple people that it does not meet the general notability requirements of Wikipedia.

--Mooshykris (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * One of the people I was *debating* with was introducing a clause about neutrality, and therefore bias, to the argument, I was simply saying that if they think that the article has bias, or is not neutral enough, then they - as a wikipedian - can edit the article to help make it less bias, as is the point of Wikipedia. DX-MON (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Let's try again
As before, I've stated that under no conditions does the article meet the Wikipedia general notability requirements. Why must you keep pursuing it?! --Mooshykris (talk) 23:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Please read the above section before posting this.... Your decision to post this was stupid considering what has been talked and requested between me and MuZemike. Please just read that before snapping back at me, and see that I am mearly asking you to wait so that the aricle can be salvaged to Kaboom42's userspace. (He cannot come back online till during the daytime tuesday being his computer has a time-lock on it, and that he's in France and goes to lycee (college) there. DX-MON (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * For your information, I have read the above multiple times, and I still see nothing that proves this article of its notability. --Mooshykris (talk) 00:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * We are not talking about notability here, we're talking about salvaging the article from the main namespace, and putting it in Kaboom42's. I'm asking (as is my right) for the deletion to be put on hold so he can decide if he wants to userfy it, and to let him have that chance before you invoke his ultimatum. (See: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Pok%C3%A9Battlers). Once the article is in a userspace, then we can sort the problems with it out peacefully. DX-MON (talk) 00:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * How about you save it then? --Mooshykris (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * That is not my decision, read his ultimatum: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Pok%C3%A9Battlers..... this is another reason for wanting the delete put on hold as I know that if you delete it you will come to regret it (he's a prodigy mathematition and a good programmer).


 * And why would I regret it? --Mooshykris (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I am too irritated to talk to you any more, I rest this to bed and archive this section. DX-MON (talk) 00:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)