User talk:D guibord

A tag has been placed on Www.guibord.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Www.guibord.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Realkyhick 06:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

March 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 23:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Anders Behring Breivik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jim1138 (talk) 00:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Anders Behring Breivik with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 00:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Anders Behring Breivik. Calabe1992 00:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Tide  rolls  00:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits Anders Behring Breivik were being reverted by multiple editors and you took no steps toward discussing your edits. This could be due to the fact that you have definite ideas for how the article should read or it could mean that you are deliberately attempting to disrupt this project.  Please do not return from your block to return to the same behavior.  Read WP:Edit war and WP:BRD.  I can assure you that if your previous behaviors are repeated longer blocks will result.   Tide  rolls  00:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

E-mail
This note is to let you know that I have received your e-mail. You are free to contact me in this manner if need be, but I have watchlisted your user talk. You may leave messages for me here and I will see them. Please understand that blocking your account was not a comment on your position or the position of the editors that reverted your edits. My block was based on my belief that you would not stop and discuss your edits on the article talk page, but continue to revert to your preferred version of the page. When you are reverted, especially by multiple editors, you need to go to the article talk page to determine a consensus on the article content. Please be sure to acquaint yourself with the guideline described at WP:Edit war before you return to editing. If you need more information or further clarification you may leave your inquiries on this page.  Tide  rolls  19:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)