User talk:D lovell

Mike Mendoza vandalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#When_adding_material_to_the_biography_of_a_living_person

Biographies of living persons should be sourced with particular care, for legal and ethical reasons. All negative material about living persons must be sourced to a reliable source. Do not wait for another editor to request a source. If you find unsourced or poorly sourced negative material about a living person — whether in an article or on a talk page — remove it immediately. Do not leave it in the article and ask for a source. Do not move it to the talk page. This applies whether the material is in a biography or any other article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

Editors should remove any negative material about living persons that is either unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source. This action is listed as an exception to the three-revert rule.

- With these clear rules in mind vague and potentially controversial statements like Mike Mendoza hates the French are not acceptable. Biographies of a living page need to be sourced...If you want to discuss this further use the discussion page, re-add the potentially libellous content and I will move to have you banned. Disillusioned-


 * With regards to that. I've reviewed the edit war, and I'm responding to Disillioned's request for a third opinion on this matter.  I have stated that this is an unlikely case for  being a violation of WP:LIVING, as views are expected from a talk show host.  However, the lack of citations is still a problem, and I'm recomending that you check with the radio station for aquiring transcripts of the broadcast.  Most stations offer these and they aren't too expensive.  Sorry for the trouble, i kan reed 18:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Bohanning
The article Bohanning has been deleted under CSD criteria G4, because it has already been deleted once after an AFD. Please see the article's previous AFD Discussion. Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 18:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mike Bohan
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mike Bohan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Falklen


A tag has been placed on Richard Falklen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Falklen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Falklen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Falklen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sarrail (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)