User talk:Daß Wölf/Archive 2

Re: Notability
To be honest, I don't think I've ever heard of the series... Still, on the strength of the sources that you provided, I feel WP:GNG is met and I wouldn't expect notability challenges.

A propos: compared to films, Croatian TV series are severely underrepresented, with the exception of recent soaps. Definitely the way to go. GregorB (talk) 10:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Grič Tunnel (Zagreb)
Hello! Your submission of Grič Tunnel (Zagreb) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DarjeelingTea (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Grič Tunnel (Zagreb)
 Schwede 66  12:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hunted (1995 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hunted (1995 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TriiipleThreat -- TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hunted (1995 film)
The article The Hunted (1995 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Hunted (1995 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TriiipleThreat -- TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gri? Tunnel (Zagreb)
The article Gri? Tunnel (Zagreb) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gri? Tunnel (Zagreb) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Please accept my apologies. The article certainly has not Failed, as I haven't finished the review. It is entirely possible my technical incompetence has led to this erroneous message. I shall check with my mentor and get back to you. Best regards.  KJP1 (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grič Tunnel (Zagreb)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grič Tunnel (Zagreb) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello - ignoring the regrettable bot error below, you'll shortly get a message to say I've put this article On Hold. Nothing major, it's a good article, but I have made some suggestions / offered some ideas for improvements. Could you have a look within the next seven days and we can then, hopefully, move it forward to GA status.  Do give me a shout if there are issues you'd like to discuss.  Best regards.  KJP1 (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grič Tunnel (Zagreb)
The article Grič Tunnel (Zagreb) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grič Tunnel (Zagreb) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you away at the present? If you need a bit more time to respond to my review, just let me know. It would be a pity for it not to Pass, when it is very close to GA.  KJP1 (talk) 06:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't near my PC the last few days. I'll get back to you later today. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 18:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, and no rush. We don't need to stick rigidly to the 7 days.  For a non-native speaker, you write very good English! All the best. KJP1 (talk) 06:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Congratulations - the notification of a Pass for the article should work its way through shortly. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

AN3 notice
Hello. FYI, I've reported the Reboot (fiction) editor to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 04:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for helping at the Reboot article. I figured it might turn out to be someone's pet topic, but I didn't think people would be this hard to reason with. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 16:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Neuro-linguistic programming
I restored the citation. It's been discussion ad nauseum on the talk page. Check the archives. talk:Neuro-linguistic programming. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * sorry about that, I was just cleaning up some backlogged edit requests. I'll try to be more careful in the future. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 02:29, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. Some articles seem to be prone to that sort of thing. Don't worry too much about it. If there is a problem, someone will probably undo your change. If you want to, a check on their number of edits might suggest something. A new account properly using an ER might warrant further checks. Cheers and thanks for all your work! Jim1138 (talk) 03:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

NLP AFD
Hi, as somebody who has contributed occasionally to articles on neuro-linguistic programming I wondered if you could have a look at this AfD, which is not getting much attention. Famous dog   (c) 07:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice, but I'm not that knowledgeable on NLP, I've just copyedited those pages on occasion. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 18:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Golden Bull of 1242
Alex ShihTalk 00:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Urban Jungle
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
I appreciate the proposal you set forth at the NOTNEWS discussion. It is solid and provides a logical rationale backed by policies and the structure of other articles. However, as I warned, there is no compromise to be found with the other side of the debate. I suggest you follow this list because we desperately need editors with your judgment to weigh-in. Otherwise, I think it will just be an endless cycle of "no consensus".TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the kind words, I see the discussion is quite heated (not unexpected given the seriousness of the topic at hand). I check AfD from time to time, I'll give that delsort a try once I have some more free time. BTW I was thinking about making an example list article to better illustrate how useful this would be. (I probably should've done that before starting that discussion.) I've started a user draft, beginning with the example I added here (note that I've basically removed only repetitions and condolences). What do you think? <b style="color:#da0000;">Daß</b> &thinsp; <b style="color:#0044c3;">Wölf</b> 02:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I suggest you consider presenting this draft for a merge proposal/RfC at the article's talk page; this draft accurately summarizes events in a much more encyclopedic style. I wouldn't be surprised if it is still opposed by the usuals but it establishes a precedent -- namely, this is how you write an article. And I think it would be a better option than me AfDing the article in a few months when RAPID no longer can be applied.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change
 * : <b style="color:#da0000;">Daß</b> &thinsp; <b style="color:#0044c3;">Wölf</b>

to
 * :  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf 

—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I've changed it, thanks for the heads up. I didn't know this could cause problems.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  00:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Collaboration
Hi Daß Wölf, nice work bringing Species to GA. I am planning to pursue a featured article nomination and I would like to cordially invite you in a collaborative effort to bring it to the Featured Article quality. I have access to this movie's collector's edition Blu-ray as well as several academic sources, and I think we might do something about the article. But before we do so, it should be reviewed for A-Class, which is one step closer to being a FA; it is less stringent than reviewing it as FA. So what do you say, interested? <i style="color: black;">Slightly</i><i style="color: black;">mad</i> 14:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'd be glad to give it a try, it'd be nice to add a FA badge to my page :) Actually if my memory serves me right I should still have a DVD with director's commentary lying around somewhere. BTW you might also want to ask User:Igordebraga, he originally wrote a sizeable part of that article.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  02:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Since I was mentioned, added more stuff. And a good place to look for content is the Little Giger database that is already providing some sources. igordebraga ≠ 04:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Reboot (fiction)
Thought you should know that Korny O'Near re-added the Den of Geek ref and "soft reboot" definition you removed back in April. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:F51A:F931:79D7:D760 (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Pukotina raja.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Croatian AfDs
Aw, this really sucks, 26 at once, it is going to be impossible to argue them all... Granted, some of them may be borderline notable. (The threshold for films is fairly high.) I'll first try to save those clearly notable and those with some actual content. Thanks for the info. GregorB (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Arhinet.arhiv.hr is the way to go - if the film is there, it's an open and shut case per WP:NFO #4. Others will be more difficult to salvage, but let's do the easy ones first. GregorB (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I used Google (... site:arhinet.arhiv.hr), it kinda worked.
 * Interesting stuff at WP:ANI... I have mixed feelings myself: while it's OK to challenge articles, these assembly-line AfDs suggest little to no checking beforehand. To be quite honest, I'd prefer all these noms withdrawn - we'll see what happens. GregorB (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Great work from you and on help saving some of these film articles. Thank you both.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I suppose in the end it's nice that someone turned our attention to these articles :)  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  23:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe we have everything under control now except for perhaps Signal Over the City. That's a fairly well known and critically acclaimed film, but its coverage is unusually scarce... GregorB (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I also saw today - with some exasperation - that there are much more. Article alerts surely provide a complete list, everything tagged with WP Croatia will appear there. GregorB (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Hedvig Hricak
I saw that you were a contributor to the article on Hedvig Hricak, and I was hoping you could help me with some revisions. I do have a COI, which I've declared on the talk page and my userpage. I've been working on improving the current version of the article to something a little more robust. I have a draft here, with some of Hricak's personal information removed (as it had been previously suppressed for privacy reasons), and some information on her research included in a separate section. I also created separate sections for her other roles, past roles, and accolades. If you have the time, could you take a look? I want to make sure that what I'm proposing is in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I'd really appreciate it!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hollywood accounting
Hollywood accounting is often tied in to marketing, which tries to advance the notion that every movie is a super huge hit on opening weekend, to influence the number of people who run out to their local movie theater to watch a particular movie. BornonJune8 (talk) 11:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, it might well be so. What is your point?  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  17:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Ndutu cranium ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ndutu_cranium check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ndutu_cranium?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Styloid process

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Reboot (fiction)
Why wasn't my edit an improvement?. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:F10D:DFE4:6F3F:789B (talk) 23:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The "all" bit is WP:OR (and arguably incorrect) and "franchise" is repetitive.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  23:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I see your point. Thanks for giving me a straight answer. I've just read WP:PARAPHRASE as well. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:F10D:DFE4:6F3F:789B (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Any time.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  00:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Zagreb Hippodrome
A very neat article, I like it. I have a weird feeling that it's as if I had written it myself - only it's better, if you know what I mean... :-)

Also, definitely not a stub - even Start class is very conservative. GregorB (talk) 21:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * hehe thanks :) It is pretty short though. Sadly there's much less about the hippodrome online than I expected or I would've gone for DYK. Still, I'm glad I learned something about it while writing :) I was surprised that not even hrwiki has an article about it...  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  01:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

 * Thanks, Meatsgains, happy holidays to you too!  Daß  &thinsp;  Wölf  15:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
(A bit belated) Merry Christmas and all the best in 2019, Daß Wölf! GregorB (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  22:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bloodsuckers (1989 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawthorne ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bloodsuckers_%281989_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bloodsuckers_%281989_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lisa Littman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Littman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lisa Littman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safrolic (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

article revert and deletion
There's no need for the redirect Free Republic of Verdis to be deleted and just so you know, Buzzara RTL is a reliable source. It's approved for Google Inclusion and is part of the RTL Group which is a major news organization in Europe. It is a reliable source, therefore things shouldn't be reverted on the dispute page.

Re: Ideas for a hook
I find multiple DYKs cool, but this particular hook is a bit hard to pull off. One might simplify "former international airport of Zagreb, Croatia" to just "Lučko Airport near Zagreb, Croatia", and I'd even drop the "MMA multiple world champion" description - he is quite popular and many people know about him, and while those who don't might be left guessing, that's also fair game for DYK (even if, in this particular case, Cro Cop is not the DYK target, but an ancillary link). I'd say this shortened version could make a fine hook. GregorB (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost
A very insightful comment. It is probably difficult for many people who edit large wikis only to quite grasp how different small wiki communities are. It indeed is the small-group mentality, but unfortunately that's not all. To use an analogy of sorts: just like Molise Croatian, being isolated from the development of the main body of Croatian language, appears almost frozen in the Middle Ages, the modern-day environment of many small wikis seems to resemble the earliest days of English Wikipedia - and not in a good way.

I've noticed that hr wiki editors have a hard time understanding the basic stuff: WP:V, WP:RS, WP:COI, WP:BLP, WP:GNG. It all seems awfully foreign to them. WP:GNG, for example, is, formally speaking, foreign to hr wiki, because there is no such guideline, but even the very concept ("hey, you've got to have at least some substantial non-primary sources") is incomprehensible to many. And it's not just delinquency to blame. I'm afraid it's going to be eternal Middle Ages for some wikis, and it won't be conducive to building an encyclopedia, at least not in the way we'd expect. GregorB (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, "gatekeeping" is the word I'm looking for, I might use it in the new Meta RfC. :-) My plan was to open a brand new RfC with an appropriate opening statement and overview of the situation, and take it from there. GregorB (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lučko Airport
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lučko Anti-Terrorist Unit
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice to all registered editors who have contributed to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film over the past year (Sept. 15, 2018-present) that a Request for Comment has been posted here. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Meta RfC
A propos some of your comments in the Meta RfC: I've always thought warning and even blocking people for "saving too often" (because ostensibly it's extra load on the patrollers) is super obtuse. What's worse, if I were a patroller, I'd be loathe to see a huge edit where all sorts of things were changed, inserted and deleted - these can be more difficult to patrol than a series of smaller edits. (Usually not being able to write a coherent edit summary is a sign too much is being done in a single edit.) This sort of gung-ho mentality about patrolling and the idea that it's somehow more important than editing will be difficult to change, but that's something I'd like to address one day. GregorB (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * A good point. What's worse, it seems that "interaction with newcomers" (i.e. going to their talk pages and admonishing them for all sorts of minor beginner errors and omissions) is a requirement for patrollers. Worst of all: it's an unofficial requirement, since AFAIK there is no page that explains what patrolling is and how it is supposed to be done. It's a mess on many levels. GregorB (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Charlotte whale
Hello! Your submission of Charlotte whale at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 17:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Neutral notice
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Charlotte whale
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2019 Australian heat wave


Hello, Daß Wölf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 Australian heat wave".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Article Superstition in Judaism has been nominated for deletion
Hello,

Since some editors are contesting existence of articles associating religions and religious communities to superstitions, One of the article which concerns topic has been nominated for deletion. You can support or contest the deletion at Articles for deletion/Superstition in Judaism by putting forward your opinion.

Thanks and regards Bookku (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

FYI
Just in case you might not know, it's der Wolf (sing.), die Wölfe (pl.). Cheers! – Alles gute! – Sca (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I know (I speak German), it was intentional ;-)  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  16:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Ha! – Sca (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That episode has one scary looking title card, hehe! And thanks, I had no idea I could watch Tatort online from Croatia, I really appreciate this :-D  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  22:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank the German taxpayers. You can see lots of old Tatort episodes on YouTube, and other German content, too. Alles gute im neuen Jahr! – Sca (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Re: Quick question
Hi!

Let me say a very nice job on the flood article!

On the WP:BLP issue, in this particular case two questions must be asked about the name-mentioning: The questions are made trickier by the fact that the cause for the arrest appears to be incidentally linked to the dam affair. (So the details of the arrest itself may or may not be partially off-topic.)
 * 1) Is there a potential for causing undue embarrassment or harm, and
 * 2) Is there a encyclopedic justification for it

W.r.t. #1 I'd say the answer is "no", because the person in question openly talked about it in the media and saw no wrongdoing on their part (although in the arrest incident, some circumstances seem to be under dispute). (The fact his name is routinely mentioned by the sources is actually not too relevant: if the sources victimize the person, consensus is Wikipedia shouldn't jump on the bandwagon.)

W.r.t. #2 I'd however also say "no". The value of the information is marginal. I'd use it to refer to the subject, if the sentences are less awkward or clearer to the reader that way. At any rate, I don't see a WP:BLP issue, so I suppose either way is OK. GregorB (talk) 20:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)