User talk:DaBoCo

Welcome!
Hi DaBoCo! I noticed your contributions to Multiple-criteria decision analysis&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 10:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Self-promotion
Hi DaBoCo! I noticed your contributions to Multiple-criteria decision analysis. You tried to add your method titled "Hierarchical Integration of Values and Evaluations under Social Constraints" to this page several times. We appreciate your contributions but please avoid using Wikipedia to advertise your own method. This behavior is against Wikipedia policies. I suggest you see the following articles for your information: PROMO, WP:SELFCITE, WP:MEDCOI, WP:EXPERT, WP:REFSPAM. We generally only cover new methods and research once they have come into wide use by others, beyond the initial researchers. Scholartop (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Scholartop! If you carefully read Wikipedia:PROMO you will see "This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view,... Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources, such as your résumé or curriculum vitae, is unacceptable". I am adding just the name of a recently published method, so please avoid being subjective . There is a novel method, is has been published, and there is no more objectivity to introduce it to a list of existing methods (please refer to "Previously published reliable sources, not Wikipedia editors, have authority for the content of this encyclopedia" in your commented Expert editors). Please, not that not even a reference is being added. DaBoCo (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You can only add notable methods Notability and it requires valid citation. You cannot leave it without citation or cite to original research. Your self-promotion is clear to everyone. Please do not edit this article. Scholartop (talk) 08:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Scholartop, In order to check what you say; could you kindly provide me the Wiki link in which the need of notability and multiple citations are needed to comment or introduce the existence of a method? Just to understand your point of view. DaBoCo (talk) 09:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Read all of them carefully: WP:FORUM, WP:PROMO Scholartop (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Scholartop, after reading carefully what you send, and the Verifiability, I understand that, if I want to add the name of the new method, I must provide reference to a peer-reviewed scientific journal for the policies of Reliable sources. Furthermore, add it without any subjective opinion, to accomplish the PROMOTION policies: "This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you". I am right? DaBoCo (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)