User talk:Da noob1

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Belinda lai) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Rehnn83 Talk 10:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Belinda lai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rehnn83 Talk 10:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Geoffrey Huang
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Geoffrey Huang, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Geoffrey Huang is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Geoffrey Huang, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Geoffrey Huang itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Smokizzy (talk) 03:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Geologyguy (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Xerophyte, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Xerophyte was changed by Da noob1 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-27T23:46:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC) --Matilda talk 00:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm...
You, good sir (ahem George.S.Z) are a fool. Its only gonna be a while before your account will get blocked for vandalism--J00dmeister (talk) 12:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)