User talk:Dabbler/Archive 1

This way to Archive 2 and Archive 3

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk)]] 18:37, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

TARS
Jibbooms and bobstays, of course I am aware of TARS, and have read/participated on Tarboard for many years. One of the greatest pleasures of my life was watching my wife read S&A for the first time to my adult to my kids, hearing it for the first time as children, simultaneoulsy recalling my mom reading it to me as a kid and re-hearing it as an adult. A multifaceted experience. - DavidWBrooks 15:09, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thank You
Thanks for correcting the picture in the article about Lord Nelson! And also for doing it so quickly. I'm very new to Wikipedia, and I have no idea how to go about doing such corrections yet, so it's nice to see that others take an interest in things being correct. Regards,--Ckaiserca 13:04, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

War of 1812
The Wikipedia entry for Fort Mackinac has a longish description of the events there in 1814, which is why I put that link in the Operations in the West, 1814 section. I won't change your edits though; the link might as well go in the Invasions of 1812 section. HLGallon 18:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Battle of Copenhagen (1801)
In response to your request for reference concerning the casualty figures, I have provided a my reference in the reference section of the article. Although it's Danish, I'm sure it counts. ;) Best regards --Boreanesia 17:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

I read your recent revision. Bravo! The article just gets better and better. Thanks! Best regards --Boreanesia 21:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Josias Rowley
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I've added your new article, Josias Rowley, to the "Did you know..." section of Portal:War. Kirill Lokshin 02:27, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Isle of Man
Hi, I have made some edits to the Onchan and Michael (parish) pages and noticed that you have done a lotof stuff on the Isle of Man page (and list it as an interest on your user page). Would you mind taking a look at it and seeing if there is anything that could be improved? Cheers -localzuk 14:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

British Post-Nominals In Introductory Sentences
Our discussion moved/refactored to the bio style guide talk page, update or improve as necessary. Tx. Metaeducation 17:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I moved it back to General O'Connor's discussion page as well, so we may continue there if you wish Dabbler.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 02:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

You can help (and you did:)
While I'm here- Thanks to all who helped take care of the Richard O'Connor article while it was on the mainpage. The RC patrol and CV unit truly ROCK most righteously, and I salute you! Once more, thanks --R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 06:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Anglica
Hmmm - Thanks for your note. I think having done a Google search, Anglica should probably not be a redirect with links or developed text to clarify how it is different to Anglia (= old name for England = the kingdom occupying the area now known as East Anglia). Learn something new every day :-)--A Y  Arktos 00:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, I thought it should not exist, but I found it certainly was a term that has been used - for example, see: . Hence I think the stub should stay and not be redirected.--A  Y  Arktos 08:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon for sending you a link that wouldn't go through your firewall. I agree that it is the Latin adjective.  The reason for sending the redirect to East Anglia was because on the redirect page there is a disambiguation to Anglia(kingdom) which in turn redirects to East Anglia.   Anglia(kingdom) should probably be developed at least as a stub.  England is perhaps too generic and large a term covering too much history.  Regards--A  Y  Arktos 21:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thinking further (and reading the article), Anglia(kingdom) is correctly redirected to East Anglia. I have no strong views as to whether Anglica redirects to East Anglia or England.  The first line of the East Anglia article allows the reader to quickly navigate to England if that is what he wants.  It is pretty clear in both articles, why you would end up there from Anglica.  Polydore Vergil's histroy was referring to England, not the East Anglian kingdom.  Accordingly I will change the redirect to England - it is better to go to an article than a disambiguation page in my opinion.--A  Y  Arktos 21:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi. I am sorry if you found the link I added on the Battle of Trafalgar to be poor. ε γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  08:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * That's fine, I just thought your opinion of it being poor was not very necessary in the article. Cheers.



Take care, ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  21:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Are you Encyclopedist's sock puppet? Just wondering because you reverted my attempt to explain why I think the link Encyclopedist found was less than adequate and there is a lot of editing of Encyclopedists User pages by this IP address. If you are a sock puppet it does seem quite immature and not at all honest to try and disguise whose editing. Dabbler 03:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I wasn't trying to disguise it. My user page sometimes jumps off when I edit, so I use this instead.  Still, your opinion does not belong in the article.  Just because you think a link is poor doesn't necessarily mean that other editors care. Sorry.  I am not a sockpuppet, I am his IP - the two are very different. Thanks. 65.32.159.187 12:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Responded on my talk page. ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  15:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Aubrey-Maturin section redirects
(copied from User talk:DESiegel) Thanks for reverting those bot changes so quickly. Dabbler 17:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I had them all on my watchlist since I did the merge and created the redirects in the first place. I saw your reversion on 21, and simply did the same thing on all the others. I have also left a msg for the bot operator. DES (talk) 17:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Double redirects
Thanks for your comment. Please see User talk:DESiegel for my reply. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Iraq Petroleum Co.
Thanks for your nice words! Thomas Blomberg 17:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Who are you ?
I am interested in learning who you are please. I would like to know how a member of the Royal Navy hate his own country / religion / church / people ? Question entered anonymously by User:198.179.142.6 18:47, 19 January 2006

Who are you?
I am genuinely interested in learning more about you. You and a certain frenchman have a lot in common. I am interested in learning how a member of the Royal Navy would hold such views. Question entered anonymously by User:198.179.142.6 23:43, 19 January 2006

Claude Auchinleck
Well, when I'm mistaken I'm mistaken (I don't even know what gave me the notion; probably the other reference in the article). Plus, my friends are hardly noble enough to be able to help defend my honour. Wally 04:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Tudor style architecture
Hi Dabbler, re the above, I agree entirely with you. I could never see why it was ever changed from 'Tudor architecture' in first place. Talk about getting one's knickers in a twist. What indeed is the difference between Tudor Style A. and Tudor A.? Almost certainly none. Dieter Simon 00:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Edward Quinan and Field Marshall Maitland Wilson
I am just pleased to be of assistance. What has also caught my interest is that the man who followed Quinan in Iraq was Henry Maitland Wilson who at the moment does not have a very good article. I note you have already made a small edit there. It would take me a bit more time to improve it than I can afford just now. But if you have some info, I will go through The Times and see what I can find to supplement it. Even then I am not sure I would know enough to write an assessment. Is there a book with assessments? -- Op. Deo 20:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

I have just found a copy of Wilson's obituary that I made nearly two years ago and had forgotten about! Tomorrow I will put some material from it on my sandbox page User:Op. Deo/test I am not very knowledgeable about WWII military matters so whatever help that people such as yourself can give will be very useful. There is a book by Wilson's son Lord Patrick, which I also need to find and read, "Where the Nazis came" Memoirs of the Second World War as told by Lord Wilson, who worked as an intelligence officer at British Army HQ in Greece at the time. -- Op. Deo 00:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Toronto Port Authority
Your entries on the Toronto Port Authority appear to represent a biased, misleading and incomplete point of view of the Toronto Port Authority. I have no objection to your inclusion of historical fact in Toronto Port Authority information. To only include information promoting your own perception or political agenda is not the purpose of Wikipedia. If you wish to add neutral and verifiable articles to this article please do so. Entries violating Wikipedia policy will be removed. I agree that some of the text I had included in my modifications was self promoting. I believe I have removed the offending entries. If we cannot agree on what constitutes a neutral POV I suggest we may submit for arbitration.Kdickson 17:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * By all means submit for arbitration. I have made precisely three edits to the article as can be seen in the history, one was a revert plus the addition of the fact that Mayor Miller ran on the anti-Island Bridge issue, one was a typo fix and wiki-linkage and one added that sailboaters were also opposed to the bridge on safety grounds.
 * You on the other hand have systematically removed all material in any way detrimental to the TPA and are an employee of the organization. I also note that you have used material verbatim from the Toronto Port Authority website, specifiaclly quotes from these pages. Port pageAirport page. This may constitute copyright infringement unless you can confirm that use of the material is permitted by the relevant TPA authorities. Dabbler 17:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Response Your addition of the information on Mayor Miller's campaign was indeed accurate, however, your reversion brought back the misleading paragraph preceding the Miller statement. The dispute was in fact not ongoing and only became a dispute with the election of Mr. Miller. The bridge was approved and lauded by the previous city council. To state that the bridge was opposed by many recreational sailors is hearsay and may be more opinion than fact.

In fact, most of the information originally posted concerning the Toronto Port Authority is the same misleading and biased information published on the Community Air and Toronto's Community Bulletin web sites.

I am an employee of the Toronto Port Authority, however, my Wikipedia entries are not sanctioned by the Toronto Port Authority. I can confirm that the use of TPA material from www.torontoport.com is permitted by the relevant TPA authorities.Kdickson 21:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Another HMS Indefatigable
Thanks for pointing me to the article about the earlier HMS Indefatigable -- I was not aware of it before. Sorry about taking almost a month to thank you, but you know how it goes: I got busy with other things, and it slipped my mind until I saw your note on my talk page again today. Indefatigable 21:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

DYK query
I don't decide on which one should make it nor do I condemn entries. I merely express my concerns and honest opinions (I read "H" for honest, not humble) - if other editors indeed feel that these articles are appropriate, they do come back on the Template talk:Did you know and I respect that opinion. An article on an author and a series of books is ok, having an article on a book in the series for DYK is like having DYK on an episode of a TV series like Friends, which routinely get rejected by other editors/admins as well. Please see that an entry from "Pigeon Post", an article you created, was updated to DYK by me. In the current case, if I remove the template and the image, the length is too low - ideally it should fill atleast a screen. You may also want to have a look at this. Also, I'd like people to be more responsive to instructions on DYK. You are supposed to suggest only free images, that is PD, GFDL and other such compliant licenses. Suggesting a fair-use image is not done. Do understand that the number of suggestions available, their diversity and date of creation play a large role in the updation of DYK. The acceptance of an item on DYK is no certificate of excellence of an article nor is its rejection, a comment on its quality. As an updating admin, I would need to exhibit discretion on what gets on to the DYK, as it is me who gets the stick (or rarely, but pleasantly, the carrot in form of welcome barnstars). I guess you get the point. Also, your bringing in India into the discussion, borders on trolling, imo - please reflect on that. Thanks for your time, --Gurubrahma 12:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Your bringing in India in that discussion hints (probably unintendedly) that I favour DYK updates with Indian content, which is untrue. My number of rejects and accepts for India-related entries for DYK would be in the ratio of 50-50, higher than general rate of rejection. Also, I welcome to see you my articles that made it to DYK - while interestingness is subjective, length is not and you may see for yourself if I follow the standards that I preach. btw, I did not accuse you of trolling, I only said that it borders on trolling. I am also a volunteer like you and I would like my WP experience to be pleasant, just as you would. I would suggest that being civil and courteous would help us both in relishing the experience. Good day, --Gurubrahma 14:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The Mauritius Command
Thanks for your copyedits and other cleanups of my humble efforts on this article. It is really beginning to get where I hoped now, largely down to your help. I might even propose it for Good Article status, which I would not have been able to do without you, Thanks. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page)  14:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Orchestrial Manoeuvres in the Dark
Well met again Dabbler (we have to stop meeting like this:). While I don't agree with everything in the MoS, nor believe it should be treated as tablets from on high, or the holy word of Jimbo. But I do think it is very sensible when it states that Brit spellings should be used for Brit subjects. In fact, I would go further and extend this consideration to authors as well. I see no reason why a contributor who was raised to use Anglo spellings, should be expected to use American ones just conform to US "sensibilities" and v. versa. To insist otherwise IS ethnocentric, in my view. So suffice to say, I agree with Brother Leithp on this matter.

Incidently, we of the WikiProject Military history, are setting up a British Military History Taskforce and we have a Napoleonic era one up and running. Please feel welcome to come join us in our dabblings. Cheers, --R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 15:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

War of 1812
It originally said "on both sides" before I changed it. One of the reasons I changed it was that it seemed to be possible to read it as implying that individual natives fought on both sides... I'm not sure what the best way of "fixing" this is. Thoughts? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Good solution. Nice work! --Dante Alighieri | Talk 23:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Copenhagen (1801)
Hi, Thanks for your message. I guessed that was what had happened. While of course we should respect all facts contributed by different people, the Danish contibutor's ideas can't be sustained. I cannot see on any basis the battle could be termed a Danish victory, and hopefully the edit will have dealt with the other two points (it's why I included he full texts of Nelson's communications with the Crown Prince). We'll see what happens. MAG1 13:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

Thanks! --evrik 16:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Is there a This user doesn't use Userboxes userbox? I don't do saints much either. Dabbler 18:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, there is ... --evrik (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Trampoline
I'm sorry if I offended you with the trampoline safety issue, I didn't mean anything personal. I looked at your examples about people getting hurt on the tramp and I can see your side of the story now. I'll try to write the section so it isn't baised either way. Jonathan talk  00:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
While checking out the template that I started, I have seen how much work you have put into the articles for the Swallows and Amazons series. Well done and thanks. I award you :

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion
Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - |WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 21:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, just priests were killed
Dabbler. Perhaps you think that makes it better somehow? I happen to be a Catholic priest, so you said that to the wrong person.

Interesting, that you think I'm Irish, given their history that would make sense. Actually I am an American of French Canadian, Scotch Irish and English decent (the latter two I'm a bit ashamed of). The Irish are not the only ones the English abused. You need to read some history from non-British POV. Peoples around the world have long bitter memories of British oppression. The British, by the way destroyed the Cathedral of Quebec city three times. And yes, that was another Anglican atrocity.

As for the ARCIC, this was a concession in one instance to appease Anglicans. However, you will not find such a reference in any encyclical nor conciliar documents. Certainly this concession does not imply that in all public fora, the Catholic Church abandons the right to use of her name. That is just pure Anglican dreaming.

I'm sure you are a decent person. But I am equally sure that you are blind to your own anti-Catholicism just as the whites of the old American South (who were almost exclusively of British decent) were blind to their racism.--Vaquero100 01:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Dabbler, my apologies for my tone. It is not an excuse, but I have been hounded for two months by an Anglican over on the RCC page who has plenty "ancestral______" whatever. In a moment of weakness I made good on a petty promise to take it to his page for a change. Still, there ought to be some recognition of the persecutions of English Catholics in the ecumenism section. It is just too blatant to omit. --Vaquero100 02:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you, Dabbler, well done.

Pistolpierre
Thanks for the heads up, I basically trimmed it completely. --Golbez 03:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Andrew Miller
Since the official RN web-site uses the term, as described, I think that they should know what to call themselves, do you not think so? (This is also what all Sea Cadets are told). Ready, aye ready :) Mousescribe 18:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

PS For the information of the NMM, "Andrew Miller" would not be found in the list of "Officers" since he would actually have been the "Leading Rate" of a shore party, ie, an officer in that he was officiating in the Shore Party. :) Mousescribe 19:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The officer did not take part in the "job" in hand, A. Miller would have been paid a "bounty" per head. The trouble is that revisionists of "myth" tend to kill the good story. And do not forget that wiki is not interested in truth, as such :) Mousescribe 20:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Always assume good faith :) Mousescribe 08:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

War of 1812 POV Question
Your and NJW494's changes don't square with most of what's written in the article. If you think the whole article is POV, please discuss it on the Talk Page, and we can consider changing it. Otherwise, let's not edit war on the intro. Sans your changes, the article is coherent (and in my view, accurate -- but, again, if you disagree, take it to Talk.) Thanks. --Cultural Freedom talk 2006-07-12 11:31 (UTC)

reqphoto
Reqphot and Reqphotoin have replaced the deprecated image requested. I believe that I place a comment on the edit history page that had (image). Of course this would not be an issue if they had keep the reqimage since there are usually paintings from that era.Hope that explains the reasoning.--Oldwildbill 11:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Swastika
Great pictures of the Swastika in the Kipling article! Sanjay Tiwari 19:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I have a lot of Kipling too, but not much in the older editions. Where did your grandmother's parents live in India? It must have been something to be actually reading the stories of the young Kipling in a newspaper when they first came out. They must have been very proud of him. Sanjay Tiwari 13:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Oscar Wilde
Hello Dabbler. I just wanted to offer any assitance that I can in the current situation over Oscar's wikipage. While this has occurred in the past a compromise has usually been attainable. Not so, so far, this time. I have been loath to enter edit conflicts in my time here at wikip, as I respect the 3RR. In this case you have presented reasonable arguments with little but sniping in return. So, again, any support or assistance that I can bring (though as a wikignome I don't know how much standing I have) please feel free to call on me. MarnetteD | Talk 14:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Dear Dabbler, Thanks very much for the Barnstar! It means a lot to me. Working on the Kipling page has been doubly enjoyable--I am getting to reread Kipling, and I'm getting the recognition of like-minded Wikipedians. Sanjay Tiwari 19:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Historical Irish Guards regiments
Hi, Dabbler, an article you created a year ago is still on the cleanup list even though many people have edited it since. My knowledge on the subject is nil; perhaps you could take a peek. -THB 21:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, in that case you should go have a peek just for a giggle. -THB 22:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:DMTramp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DMTramp.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

IoM Myths and Legends
Hi Dabbler, I can understand why you removed my bits about St Juan as you probably haven't read the book that I mentioned, I realise i didn't put the author's name and ref number on the ref list. However The book does exist and the (very) potted history that I put in there was researched from the book. What's more there is a St Juan Foundation. I know it's strange that there is no google entry, but until recently most of this stuff was just passed down by generation by stories. By the way, Leaving the legends of the Buggane and Moddey Dhoo in, and removing the St Juan lines because it was "nonsense" made me chuckle. I'm going to do some more research on the St Juan legend, and try and get in touch with someone from the foundation. There's something happening on the 24th of this month called the Stone Run in Port St Mary. At midnight some people will apparently leg it from the Station pub hop over the wall opposite and run through the field opposite to the big medieval stone that stands there, and back.... wearing nothing but stout shoes!! I kid you not. Anyway, apparently this ties in somehow with the St Juan thing (I thought it best not to mention that in my piece). I'll let you know how I get on, then if you agree I can add my bits back onto the page. By the way the book is very good. You can borrow it if you like.

Cheers, Mike Catlow.

St Juan
Ha ha ha ha, you're right Dabbler, it sounds very odd. I found the book in Ottakers in Douglas, under the Local Myths and Legends section. I'm going to make it my mission to find out some more about the St Juan Foundation and the hilariously titled Knights of the High Corracle of St Juan. I'll keep you informed of anything I find out and run it by you before updating,

Cheers Mike. --Cat 15:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Nelson
I just didn't rollback far enough. Sorry. Yomangani talk 12:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

War of 1812 - end date
When you reworked the infobox, why did you put Feb 13 as the end date for the war? Was it just a mistake, as the Treaty was proclaimed on Feb 18th? thanks Tom 16:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I did look at the history. Sorry, I meant to get in contact with Mike Macgregor you just had an edit close to his rework in August. Tom 16:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

It Came Upon the Midnight Clear
Thanks for making the change to the title of the page. However, I believe that you got the capitalization wrong. The correct title should be "It Came Upon the Midnight Clear" ("the" isn't capitalized).

(Edit: I figured out how to make the change; it now resides under the correct title heading.)

Gandalf StormCrow

Oscar Wilde editor problems
Hi Dabbler. I see that you have already caught the fact that we have a new editor that is making major changes to Oscar's article all without sources or edit summaries. I posted the following messages on Jmabel's talk page as he has helped oversee problems on this page before. But I notice that his main page says that he may not be taking as active a role in wikipedia anymore so I am going to post them on the Admion notice board also. If you have any other ideas of where we can take our concerns please let me know and I will give whatever assistance I can. Thanks. MarnetteD | Talk 17:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Here are my previous postings,


 * Editor Neal kydd has recently made a series of edits on the Oscar Wilde page without providing sources and which seem to me to have a touch of original research. While I could be wrong about the orig. res. aspect the message on the editors talk page seems to bring it into question. In any event the lack of sources is the bigger issue and I am wondering if you might be able to give this editor some direction in this area (if you have the time). It is also possible that I am out of line about this which is why I have come to you as I know that you will let me know if I am and I want to avoid a revert war. Many thanks for your time in this matter. MarnetteD | Talk 16:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Since my above message another change has been made removing some of the article as it stood wothout any comment why in the edit summary and another question has popped to mind, in that, if this editor is adding passages from their published works is there a copyvio problem on the horizon. Again, I could be off base but I wanted to make you aware of all of this. MarnetteD | Talk 17:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Oscar Wilde needs sprucing up. Damn you editors!

Re: Edward Quinan
One place to start is by checking out the (relatively new) B-Class criteria of the Military History WikiProject. Obviously, they're only guidelines, but it's one place to start. Probably the most important things you can do (given limited information) are add citations to the article and improve the quality of the supporting materials. In the case of the latter, you may want to fill out the infobox more completely, and see if there are any templates you can add. You don't want to overload with templates, but if there are preceded by/succeded by templates for his commands, you may want to add them. The article also wants a few minor tweaks for style and tone, but nothing serious in that regard. Carom 17:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I should also point out that you will likely have to create a template for "preceded by/succeded by" (if one is appropriate) or just create a basic table in the article itself (which is fine, too). Carom 06:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Post Captain
Would you be able to improve the spoiler free "Plot introduction" rather than remove it. Now there is nothing to give much idea about the story without going into the main summary, which gives far too much away if all you desire is a taster. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  11:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Lafontaine
Wow. My bad. I thought I was undoing the test post. Sorry and thanks for pointing out that mistake. Enviroboy 00:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Oscar Wilde
Hi (after many months) again Dabbler. I hope that you are well. My apologies for making you do extra work on Oscar's page. I did not pay attention to the time frame of the situation and your fix was a nice compromise between the edit that I changed and the facts of the time. Thanks again and take care. MarnetteD | Talk 18:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Now that is timing. I was going to write you this morning about the same subject. Because Scotland and Wales of the time period still had flags to represent them I was wondering if Ireland might not have had a flag too. I'm not sure how to find it but I was going to suggest replacing the tricolor with it. Unfortunately, I am not computer literate at all and wouldn't know where to begin in creating one. Perhaps a note posted at the Admin notice board or the Village Pump or the wikiproject biography page might turn up somebody with the answers to these questions. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. MarnetteD | Talk 12:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Aubrey-Maturin Series
Hello, I got your message about the re-directs back to the main page ref. the individual novels. What I am trying to do is to create new article pages for each individual novel (as has been done for Master and Commander and Post Captain. I have put in the code for each novel but they still redirect. What I would like to know is how can I now direct these to a new article page so that I can start working on every novel that currently doesn't have its own main article page. I know that Kevinalewis is also working on this project so we can hopefully coordinate on this together Ivankinsman 07:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[plus, I was wondering if you want to put all comments relevant to this series under this section of your talk page ... might be easier to keep track if everything is in one place...] Ivankinsman 07:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * To get to the Redirected book page, type in the name of the book e.g."The Reverse of the Medal". when you get redirected back to Aubrey-Maturin series you will see right at the top in small letters under the top heading "Redirected from The Reverse of the Medal". Click on that link and you will get to the Redirect page which you can edit. Dabbler 15:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Beaumont Cut
My edit fails to withstand scrutiny by a true Ransome expert—thanks for picking up the mistake!--Old Moonraker 11:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

"Roman" Catholic
This is your POV. I have a question. Ever time I have ever tried to make wikipedia more accurate by removing incorrect terms I have always been told I am vandalising. Everyone with power on wikipedia gets THEIR way, but not me because I am trying to do the right thing. Were in any offical Church document does the Church call herself ROMAN Catholic? Quaker24 05:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Do you want wikipedia to be completely acruate or baised for the sake of so called clarity? Quaker24 05:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The Roman Catholic Church call herself just that in EVERY document dealing with relations with the Anglican Communion. Here is one:  -- SECisek 05:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

FAC
Thomas Cranmer has been nominated for a FA status. Just thought you should know since you were the only other person who edited it more then a handfull of times. Wish me luck on that one. -- SECisek 06:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:NissenandKangaroo.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:NissenandKangaroo.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:NissenandKangaroo.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: No proper Wikipedia License To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:NissenandKangaroo.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Anna Dogonadze
Looks like I was on autopilot for that change. Good catch. I've changed the link to point to sportsperson. --Bobblehead (rants) 17:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Better Not Drowned
You're right. Link should remain. Albatross2147 22:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Anglican collaboration of the month
Wassupwestcoast 02:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Gymnastics Invitation
Your edits or discussions show that you may be interested in the new Gymnastics Wikiproject. Please join and help to start this new wikiproject. We need lots of members and lots of help. Wikiproject Gymnastics also contains the related sports of cheerleading, power tumbling, and trampolining. MsDivagin 01:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Gaelic lesson
I should have known better than to "correct" the spelling of "Mann" to "Man", assuming the former to be a typographical error. The nomenclature of your ancient isles is as beset with cultural boobytraps for the unwary as the soil is full of Viking hoards, Roman coins, and whatnot. Please forgive a naïve barbarian from the untamed Wild West for having blundered so terribly. "Every time I 'ASSUME', I make an 'ASS' out of 'U' and 'ME'." Writtenright (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Writtenright
 * "Let it be, let it be, let it be, yea, let it be; speaking words of wisdom, let it be." Writtenright (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Writtenright

Somerset photos & invite to wikiproject
Thanks for the photos. If you have photos of other Villages in Somerset or Buildings and structures in Somerset please add them. I'm gradually putting all those that do not yet have photos into Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Somerset but I haven't got very far yet.&mdash; Rod talk 20:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Whoops
Hi Dabbler. Thanks for fixing my booboo on Oscar's page. I had gotten so used to always having to take that out that I hadn't paid attention to the original mentions disappearance. Of course, I am one of those that wishes it wasn't there at all, but, it will always get put back in so I am glad that your edit summary told me how naughty I was to not check the whole section before removing it. I'll try to be more careful in future. Thanks again. MarnetteD | Talk 00:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Amy Johnson
Hi Dabbler. I had to laugh at the summary for an edit you made to Amy Johnson today:

(→ Death - full stop)

Very apt! - Gobeirne (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

England or the UK?
Is there some reason you don't wish to use the country UK (i.e. that recognised by the United Nations)? Taking your assumed desire to an extreme, one would have to reduce Ransome's localities to the smallest location possible. If you can justify the use of England as opposed to the UK I'll stop changing them. Ransome was a British citizen not an English one. His mother lived in Scotland for a time (Edinburgh). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.190.242 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 18 January 2008


 * I have Irish, Scottish and English ancestry and probably no one is more likely to use the term British when it is justified, as I detest the use of England/English in the wrong place. Ransome never lived in Scotland and he brought Evgenia her to live in England at Low Ludderburn and even more specifically to the Lake District, I would have to check but it was either Westmorland or Cumberland at the time. However, you don't justify why when places or locations are wholly in one of the constituent kingdoms of the United Kingdom, it is inappropriate to use that name instead of the more general UK. Ransome's mother lived in Leeds all his life as I recall, but I agree that his brother did live in Scotland for a few years before Geoffrey's death in the First World War. Why are you obsessed with this rather small point in one article, there are thousands of other with many more egregious errors out there in Wikipedia where England is used totally incorrectly, whereas here it is a perfectly correct usage. Spend your Wiki time more usefully than getting into edit wars. Dabbler (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Aha!
A picture of Just Bounce's double mini? Editing Edward Quinan's page? (Not to mention that the link there contains his family tree.) I've seen your contributions to the Trampolining article for years, but I had no idea it was someone I knew.

You probably won't have to look at my contributions to unscramble my identity. Manicwhale (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The alternative was lawmachine; I think I made the right choice.

And yeah, Oshawa, if I can figure out where that is. Manicwhale (talk) 02:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Which baronet?
How interesting. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography has him as the 4th, your source claims he was 6th, the website of Clan Strachan says he was the 8th, and Thomas Wise's 'Life and Naval Career of Admiral Sir Richard J. Strachan' has him as the 10th baronet. Wise includes a little genealogical run-down as well, so his claim seems well researched at least. Perhaps some more thought on this is necessary. Benea (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Analogy vs OR
Well I don't really care, so I will not challenge it. But you are stopping an interesting point from getting into Wikipedia by being a paper-pushing rule-interpreter. I have no stake in the massacre, I just thought people would find it interesting that there was an analogy. Do every one a favor anf change it back yourself, just to do a service to the readers instead of being an objection generator. History2007 (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

PS: I just figured it out. You Royal Navy love siuggests that you are a Brit lover, who does NOT want the Brtish massacres mentioned too much. That is the real reason for your objection. I bet you read the Daily Telegraph too. And did you say "colonial setting" on one of those pages? I am amazed! Are you, even for a second, suggesting that Indan lives are worth less than others? This is the 21st century pal, all lives are worth the same - infinately precious. Wake up and start loving all people of all colors. History2007 (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The following was posted on History2007's Talk page but which was deleted by that editor immediately.

Try reading Assume Good Faith
Unfortunately Wikipedia is not a collection of "interesting" factoids, it is supposed to be an encyclopedia of knowledge supported by published sources. Secondly my use of the term colonial was to point out that there is a difference rather than an analogy between people being massacred by their own governments e.g. Peterloo massacre and being massacred by their colonial overlords. Also I am Canadian and do not read the Daily Telegraph being rather more a Toronto Star person than the National Post type. I would also like to point out that i have contributed a lot of material to Wikipedia over the last few years and am not a particularly a rule enforcer, but this was too blatant to let go unchallenged. Dabbler (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, apparantly we are Brit loving racists judging from his message on the talk page. He really does take the biscuit. Narson (talk) 09:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I thought you didn't edit Falklands War articles, now you've only gone and confirmed the conspiracy theory...;o) Justin talk 23:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
I did not know.--Otterathome (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Wine-Dark Sea image
No not at all. I was trying to add a few images and have found I had used a "smaller than usual" setting. So having put a "very large" sizing - realised my mistake and am in the process of putting up a revised set of images and bringing the sizes back to normal. We have just tripped over each other I think. By the way I like all the work you and Ivankinsman have been doing on this series. It is much more in keeping with the notability of the literature that they used to be. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  14:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Wine-Dark-Sea cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Wine-Dark-Sea cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This way to Archive 2