User talk:Dac04/Archive 2

Conscience Films
Hi,

I added four different sources (newspapers, reviews etc.) I will continue to add. I suggest you to review the article again and decide on removing the deletion tag because the top of the article looks like mess. Thank you. Ali55te (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The deletion review is not solely up to me. The article is certainly in much better shape and better referenced than when I nominated it. Not knowing Turkish and thinking that "Conscience Films" and "Films about Conscience" were not the same made it difficult to find sources.  Dac04 (talk) 22:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you look at the page, all the references I added is in English. Since conscience and films can return millions of results you need to be more specific on the search. For example if you just add hrant dink foundation on your search then you can find plenty of links. Ali55te (talk) 22:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have withdrawn the AfD based on the addition of sources. Dac04 (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I might rename the article seems like, some others also could not interpret that conscience films and films about conscience is the same project. Ali55te (talk) 22:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Gourami Watcher  (Gulp) 16:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Bioactivism
Hi Dac04,

You did a speedy deletion of Bioactivism for section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I was just wondering if you had any suggestions for stating a trademarked term without using "unambiguous advertising"? Would it be better to add it to the company's page? Let me know, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oskadosk (talk • contribs) 15:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The page as it was simply said that the term was trademarked and linked to a company's promotional website, which seems like an entirely promotional article. Articles on neologisms can be difficult, as wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary.  Basically for the term to have its own page it has to have recieved coverage in reliable secondary sources.  To quote from the wikipedia guide on neologisms "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." You may want to review wikipedia's policy on neologisms and wikipedia's policy on external links to help guide you. If the company that has the term trademarked has its own page it may be more appropriately placed as a section on the company's page.  Hope this is helpful.  Dac04 (talk) 16:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Jerad Finck Page Deletion
Hi Dac04, I recently created a page for Jerad Finck as I am a part of his management team. This was deleted by you as I used copy from our website. How do we get this back up? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peachypromo (talk • contribs) 21:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are the owner of the copyrighted text from the article you can donate the copyrighted material. You can read more about it here: Donating copyrighted materials. Dac04 (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)