User talk:Dace83

TUSC token 7cd0060e2f90d35d34411a66a6810761
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
 * Now that you have the account, please use it with Magnus' tool to upload Geograph images to the Commons. You may also like to know that Ben Brooksbank has a vast collection of station images which he is uploading. I e-mailed him with a specific request - he could not help but at least he responded. &mdash; RHaworth 17:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you read the above? Why are you still uploading here? &mdash; RHaworth 23:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You should also be uploading the high-res version of each image. &mdash; RHaworth 07:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know how to use it, tried several times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dace83 (talk • contribs)
 * Magnus' tool has just three mandatory input fields. Which one do you not understand? &mdash; RHaworth 17:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't know the password

Before I get told off again I have uploaded a couple of images which need transfering to the commons, I know I have a tusc account but I can't use it as It won't let me upload due to not accepting the password.


 * Try signing up for TUSC again as though it was a new account. &mdash; RHaworth 02:59, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sisland Carr for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sisland Carr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sisland Carr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Erik Sergeant (talk) 10:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)