User talk:Daceton

Welcome!

Hello, Daceton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Luc Perino, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Luc Perino


The article Luc Perino has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. AllyD (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Of what Real Use is a Physician


The article Of what Real Use is a Physician has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced article about a book which does not demonstrate the notability of the subject. In particular, there is no evidence this book meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability of books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

References to establish notability
I've flagged various articles that you've created today. The English Wikipedia requires the content of all articles to be covered in reliable sources, in particular to establish WP:NOTABILITY. So it is a requirement to include such references when creating a biography of a living person, and good practice to include them when creating any article. AllyD (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Please don't remove references from articles. The Le Monde reference is the only one currently supporting the Luc Perino article and preventing it from being an unreferenced biography. So by all means add more to improve the article, but less is not more. AllyD (talk) 22:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And please read WP:NBOOK; none of the book articles that you have created today show any sign of meeting these criteria. AllyD (talk) 22:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medical humour


The article Medical humour has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article about a book, that does not meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion of articles about books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Will Darwin Come?


The article Will Darwin Come? has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article about a book, that does not meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion of articles about books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A short story of drugs


The article A short story of drugs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article about a book, that does not meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion of articles about books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Luc Perino and his books
You asked about the books: my inclination is that they would be better covered in the biography article, as works building the subject's notability, rather than separately, at least until/if they get translated/published/reviewed in English.

I might have suggested substituting redirects from the title pages to the biography, but titles don't always transliterate. (Nobody would have guessed Proust's 1st volume would become known as "Swann's Way", and for that matter if Nabokov had translated, from memory, he would have called it "A Walk by Swann's Place".) If I was publishing "A quoi sert vraiment un médecin?" I'd probably go for "What good is a doctor?" or "Are doctors worthwhile?". So the names can be a problem - unless they already have scheduled English publication under these names? AllyD (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Calabe1992 22:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)