User talk:Dachannien/Archive 3

Jeremiah Wright
I am sorry to raise issue with this, but Ronald Kessler is one of the most partisan and least reliable sources, who has often published inaccurate information in the past. He is not NPOV source. The quotes used are phrases out of context, with use of many ellipses. Find the actual sermon, and quote directly from them in a more complete form. --Tkhorse (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Question about my talk page
Was this directed at him or me?  Grsz  11  16:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was directed at him. We've both reverted that edit of his, and he still hasn't discussed it on the article talk page.  He's actually on the verge of 3RR with it.  -- Dachannien TalkContrib 16:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * He left a comment on the talk page, something about how poor that article, and Wikipedia in general is. His edits are really bad POV.  Grsz  11  16:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Santorum
Far be it from me to be perceived as a defender of the former Senator, but my reason for adding the quotation marks to 'official' was because there is no specific set authority in the English language that assigns specific definitions. DS (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. That's why I removed the word "official" in its entirety.  -- Dachannien TalkContrib 12:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Protection
Heh, well hopefully they would've given up by then. But 3 days gives the article some time-out anyway. :) Best, PeterSymonds (talk)  20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Oaks Christian High School
An article that you have been involved in editing, Oaks Christian High School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Oaks Christian High School. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 22:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christian Alliance Fellowship Church


The article Christian Alliance Fellowship Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I find no matches on GBooks or GNews. There seems little reason to expect the article to meet the general notability guideline in the near future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)