User talk:Dacodava~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello Dacodava, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fawcett5 19:16, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

From Jmabel
You asked:
 * Hey man! Do you have any problem in telling my opinions? Dacodava


 * Tocmai am citit profilul tau. Esti cumva român?


 * Poti sa mergi pe wikipedia in limba romana si gasesti la: "Listă domnitori moldoveni", articolele facute de mine. Dacodava from Bacau County

Answers:
 * Not sure what the first question refers to, but in general, no, unless you try to do it in the articles. If there was something in particular, you'll have to point it out: I've probably touched about 300 different pages in the last 48 hours, and I have no idea where we corssed paths, except that I assume it was something related to Romania or Moldova.


 * No, I'm in no sense Romanian. I worked 6 months in Bucharest 2001-2002, and I'm good with languages, so I picked up half-decent foreigner's Romanian:
 * Am lucrat şase luni la Bucureşti în anulile 2001-2002 şi sunt bun cu limbe, şi am învăţat român de straine mediul decent. Nu perfect, eu ştiu, dar pot sa citesc mai bine.


 * I took a look and eventually found that article. Are you aware that it's been moved, and they didn't even leave the old name as a redirect? The move seems fine, but why remove the redirect?


 * Anyway, welcome, hope you will stick around & do good work. -- Jmabel | Talk 17:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I wrote about UDMR that is a terrorist organization and you placed after my opinion, the  word "troll". It was adressed to me? What is your relationship with a terrorist organization like udmr? Why do you take their side? Dacodava | Talk


 * I consider it trolling to accuse a party that has been a member of most Romanian government coalitions in the last decade of being a terrorist group. I don't like UDMR's politics at all, but there is a long way from "politically reprehensible" to "terrorist". -- Jmabel | Talk 17:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

UDMR has a terrorist request!!! UDMR first article in statute is that they ask about territorial authonomy-- Dacodava

from Bonaparte
Salut! I like your definition on the user page. maybe you will like to check the recent dispute regarding to the Moldovan_language and take some support actions. Your help is wellcomed. Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs
 * Not the NAME but the actions counts. Impreuna suntem o forta. Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs
 * There is no unitary Moldovan language- the next step. Thank you for all, you've been great today! Bonaparte   talk  &  contribs
 * Salut! Please check the latest addition on Moldovan language. It seems that user Node deletes systematic an important part of the text. Plus, you may suppor the action to file a vandalism report as proposal of Dpotop []. Stay sharp. Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs
 * Fully agree with your nice user page! Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs
 * Thank you Dacodava! We will continue of course. Just stay sharp. I just want to say that I reserve my rights to strike anytime when they least expect it. Fii pe faza! Soon I need your help. Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs

Hi Dacodava, please check this out Transnistria and also on the talk page, your help is needed! Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs Suntem o forta! By the way just look at the [] you might discover something really nice about the "all-powerful entity made of pure energy" namely Mark Williamson also known as Node. Tot inainte! Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs

Hora
Thanks for the info on hora! I suppose I should have looked at Hora (sometimes the most obvious is the most easy to miss...) Happy editing, Antandrus  (talk) 15:36, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stick to English
on English wikipedia, even when talking to a Romanian like myself (we can talk in Romanian on Romanian Wikipedia if you prefer, but I guess you don't have the guts there to tell me what you've just told me here, I wonder why? Speaking in English here is a proof of respect for other people who don't speak Romanian (it is the great majority, I'm not sure if you realize that). My nationality or where I live does not concern you at all & by the way, I might as well live in New Zealand, but I do keep up with things happening in Romania, so this aspect is irrelevant. I'll come back to Romania for Christmas & New Year but I'm sure I won't find a new hungarian state. And if I were to finish in the same tone like you, I would say alarmists like yourself make me sick. --Vlad 14:38, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Domnitorii moldoveni
Ce ma, eu scriu povesti? Unde vezi tu povesti? --Anittas 21:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Baietas, nu pune mana pe articolul inceput de mine despre Dragos si Bogdan prin a sterge ce am scris eu. Alea nu sunt povesti! De unde ai scos tu ca sunt povesti? --Anittas 21:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Ma, omule, ce ai scris tu am scris si eu; numai ca eu am scris mai detaliat. Bravo tie ca ai scris ce s-a scris intro enciclopedie, dar asta nu inseamna ca ce am scris eu este gresit.

Dupa cum am inteles eu, Radauti a fost prima capitala (curtea domneasca), iar Louis la trimis pe Bogdan spre Moldova, dar se poate ca el a plecat de cont propriu. --Anittas 09:10, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Ma, o enciclopedie nu este un axiom; iar ti-am spus ca ce spune enciclopedia nu contrazice ce am scris eu. Eu am scris mai detaliat. Enciclopedia a scris pe scurt, asa cum se scrie in enciclopedii. --Anittas 09:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Atuncea sterge ce am scris despre Radauti, dar numai sectiunea aia - nu mai mult! --Anittas 09:35, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop harassing users
Stop harassing users who do not share your point of view. This behaviour is frowned upon and is likely to get you blocked. Your friendly "Hungarian" neighbour, IulianU 11:40, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Besides, you were insulting an administrator of Romanian Wikipedia, how about that? Are you so blinded by hatred that you see enemies there were there aren't any?!? And, oh, by the way, edits like this one: http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discu%C5%A3ie:Uniunea_Democrat%C4%83_Maghiar%C4%83_din_Rom%C3%A2nia&diff=prev&oldid=148287 can & will get you in trouble on Romanian Wikipedia, too! Please mind your attitude, your words, observe the Wikiquette and oh, last but not least, you should at least have the decency to apologise to me. --Vlad 12:05, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Death threats
Do not make death threats against other users. You have been blocked for a week - next time will be for longer. Phil Sandifer 01:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

reirytnchdte

Ronline for Admin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ronline and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Ronline. I have nominated Ronline to be Administrator for English Wikipedia. Let's vote for him! Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs
 * Thankx for voting! -- Bonaparte  talk  &amp;  contribs  21:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Alexander for Admin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007. I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte  talk  &amp;  contribs  14:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Our forum
Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 17:40, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand
why you're confessing to me. You've got an attitude problem & you should be solving that first. You simply cannot treat people like you do. You did not try to explain anything to Iulian, but you simply kept swearing, so he didn't want that on his talk page. You should have been warned: you had already got a block here, on English wikipedia, based on your attitude; it was only a matter of time until you've got yourself one on Romanian wikipedia, too. As you could see, it wasn't either Iulian or me who issued the block, so if you ever want to continue working on wikipedia, even if only transcribing articles from an enciclopedia, no one said this was bad, well you're welcome back, if and only if you prove you can behave. --Vlad 12:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

When
When did I ask you a question?? Never! So why are you posting messages on my talkpage? They seem to have no point. Please leave me alone. --Node 09:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Deletions on Iasi page
It is unclear to me why you would delete all of the information on the history of Jews in Iasi, including the pogrom. Iasi has played an important role in modern Jewish history, and the pogrom itself was the deadliest pogrom against the Jews. It makes no sense to delete information that is accurate and sourced and related specifically to Iasi, especially without discussing first, can you explain why you are doing this? --Goodoldpolonius2 15:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for one month
After having previously been blocked for one week due to death threats, you have made anti-semitic, racist, and insulting comments. Your record above indicates constant abuse of the rules of civility. Enough is enough. If you return, remember to be civil. --Goodoldpolonius2 15:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

This user has been blocked permanently
For continued uncivil behavior through admitted sockpuppets despite your block and repeated warnings. --Goodoldpolonius2 13:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * If he promise to behave better will you unblock him? Bonaparte   talk  16:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I can't think of a good reason to justify unblocking him. Before I ever encountered him, he had already been blocked once by another administrator, and warned by several other users, which had no effect on his behavior.  After being blocked again for a month for continued abuse by myself, he immediately posted this to my user page from a sockpuppet account, which hardly sounds like a promise to behave better. --Goodoldpolonius2 16:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Well, I think you have your answer about better behavior. He really loves making death threats, doesn't he? --Goodoldpolonius2 10:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It didn't quite take; I've reapplied the block. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Image:250px-ScanImage04.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:250px-ScanImage04.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Madmedea 21:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Image:405px-Roman.I.pictura-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:405px-Roman.I.pictura-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Madmedea 21:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Teatrul.Tineretului.PN.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Teatrul.Tineretului.PN.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia
Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 02:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

File:250px-ScanImage04.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:250px-ScanImage04.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

File:250px-ScanImage04.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:250px-ScanImage04.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dacodava. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dacodava~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)