User talk:Daddycakes304020

Welcome!
Hi Daddycakes304020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 21:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Emily Blunt
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced information to this article. Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people says that all material about living people which is contentious, sensitive or likely to be challenged must be cited inline to a reliable source. The kinds of sources you posted in your edit summary are not appropriate for this information. Additionally if one of you edits is challenged then usual process is to discuss the issue on the article's talk page instead of edit warring. Continued edit warring can get you blocked from editing.  Hut 8.5  20:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Emily Blunt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok so I have proof of her middle names but no one is addressing the fact that I am correct in my edits and changing them anyway. Daddycakes304020 (talk) 21:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to use the talk page of the article to gain consensus for that change. Twitter is not a reliable source either, so please familiarize yourself with what is considered reliable too. If you continue to make the edit without consensus, you will end up losing your privilege to edit here . Never mind... I see you've just continued. You have now breached WP:3RR. — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 21:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Did you watch the video!? Its literally Emily herself saying her middle name is LAURA. Daddycakes304020 (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * And what proof do you have that the video was not doctored? This is why reliable sources matter. Without that being a verified video, it can't even count as a WP:PRIMARY source. — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 21:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

It was obviously not altered in any way. Her middle names are Olivia Laura. She’s even said it to me in person because I know her. Daddycakes304020 (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be considered original research which is still not acceptable for an encyclopedia. It needs to be stated in a reliable source, and you have not presented one yet. — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 21:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Daddycakes304020 (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

You know I’m right Daddycakes304020 (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No. is right that that would be considered original research, which is not acceptable for an encyclopedia. Additionally, I strongly caution against making personal attacks. If you continue to do so, you will have your talk page access revoked and risk lengthening the block as personal attacks are also a blockable offence that is not tolerated. -- The SandDoctor  Talk 22:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Hut 8.5  21:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The SandDoctor Talk 21:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Violet Krasinski


Hello, Daddycakes304020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Violet Krasinski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hazel Krasinski


Hello, Daddycakes304020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hazel Krasinski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)