User talk:Daduxing

Teahouse question
Hello! Your question at the Teahouse have one answer. w.carter -Talk  09:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese emperors family tree (early), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liu Xi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your experience with Wikipedia so far
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm W.carter, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, w.carter -Talk  20:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:W.carter&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

February 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=646636402 your edit] to Zhou dynasty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
WP:Identifying reliable sources  Tide  rolls  13:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Responding to your message on my user talk. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.  Please locate and cite a source for your content.  Tide ' rolls  14:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Did you notice the request at the top of my user talk?  Please make an effort to keep discussions in a single location.  They're much easier to follow that way.  Thanks  Tide ' rolls  14:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I would add that ancient documents like the Bamboo Annals and Sima Qian's history are primary sources, and not suitable for such content (see WP:PRIMARY). In the case of Shang synasty, the article already has a table of the royal line sourced to reliable secondary sources.  In addition, you are duplicating your content from Family tree of ancient Chinese emperors, which complicates maintenance.  You're making the list hidden, but users can as easily click of a "see also" link as a "show" button.  Kanguole 14:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Later Han, Northern Han, Later Jin, Later Tang
Hi, in the articles of Later Han (Five Dynasties), Northern Han, Later Jin (Five Dynasties), and Later Tang, there is a template of "Turkic topics" on each of these articles (on the articles' bottom). The inclusion of this particular template is baffling because it doesn't relate to these articles (in which they are about dynasties and kingdoms, while the template is about broad Turkic topics).

There are also a bunch of categories at the bottom (Historical Turkic states; Turkic states; Turkic dynasties; History of the Turkic peoples) that are very much redundant. For example, if there is already a category of Historical Turkic states, what's the point of adding Turkic states and Turkic dynasties and all the other stuff? The same with History of the Turkic peoples.

Do you think this "Turkic topics" template should be removed from these articles and the categories be reduced?--TheLeopard (talk) 12:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello. I agree. We should keep those articles in a simple way. In fact, contrary to what the nationalists of the Rep. of Turkey thinks, those states were ruled by sinizated people. They were (far) more chinese then turks.  Daduxing (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you mind clean up these articles and the templates and categories?--TheLeopard (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. Sure. Daduxing (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi again, I noticed that you removed the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period template from these articles. In my opinion, the Five Dynasties Ten Kingdoms templates should stay in the articles, since it provides organization.  However, there seems to be another template, "History of the Turks pre-14th century" that are also on these articles, and that template should be removed.
 * Also, I don't think the Category:History of China you added is necessary.
 * And maybe, I think perhaps one of these Turkic categories could stay, like Turkic dynasties, since the rulers were of that ethnicity. But I agree with you on removing the large amount of very superfluous Turkic categories (Historical Turkic states, Turkic states, History of the Turkic peoples for example) and links.--TheLeopard (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi. I removed the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms template from a mistake. I added it back, and I also added the Category:Turkic dynasties as you suggested. Daduxing (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Later Tang
Hello Daduxing. I've just left an edit warring notice for User:Mehmeett21 regarding Later Tang. Though I notice that you are someone who pays attention to good sourcing, when you go ahead and break WP:3RR it is likely there will be admin intervention. You've also made no posts at all at Talk:Later Tang. Ask for assistance if you are not aware of how to resolve disputes on Wikipedia. It appears to me that Mehmeet21 may be blocked soon if he continues, but I hope this won't happen to you. Patience is needed. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi EdJohnston. That's OK, I can always explain my edits if I'm asked. Thank you for advices Daduxing (talk) 17:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Explaining is not enough. You are risking a block, so you should be careful. If you are sure you are right, why haven't you posted anything at Talk:Later Tang? EdJohnston (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Georgian family trees
Hello Daduxing, even though I appreciate your work, that all makes the family trees redundant with incomprehensible load which makes the pages literally impossible to navigate. Please stop re-adding all those load data as these family tress are only for the monarchs and not of their dozens of children. Jaqeli 13:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I disagree. (1) It is a nonsense to say that my edits are making the articles impossible to navigate. What? You don't use the scroll?; Incomprehensible? Why, can't you read them?! (2) That family trees are too simple, I improved them. It is nothing unfit in adding the children or consorts of the kings. The vast majority of family trees are like that. This is what a family tree is about. You are just making a petty, empty, monarchs listing. --Daduxing (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I concur with the points made above by Daduxing] on the content and layout of the Bagrationi family trees, especially the point that important branches of the dynasty should be included. [[User:FactStraight|FactStraight (talk) 07:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Family tree collapsible code
Please add a link to an example on my talk page where you want to change the font size. -- PBS (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * thanks for providing the example Family tree of the Kingdom of Goryeo


 * See Advanced text formatting and also Metawiki:Help:Tables § XHTML attributes


 * When user:TimR created template:chart/start (s)he included a nifty parameter called "style=". When user:Gadget850 expanded template:chart/start to include the "align=" parameter (s)he kept the "style=" parameter. This is a nifty get out of jail free card because by adding a parameter called "style=" one can change lots of attributes for which there is no real demand to include as parametrised option because they are already documented. But the documentation is written in typical programmer style: very unclearly unless the person who is reading them is a programmer who does not really need the documentation other than as a aid memoir! As the the old programmer saying goes "documentation is easy it doesn't even have to compile".


 * See this diff for how to change font size to 150% and below the diff for what it looks like.


 * -- PBS (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monarchs of Spain family tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Family tree of ancient Chinese emperors
Most of 中国君主世系图列表 was made by me,but some was not ,those have a large amount of error.And your translation also made a large amount of error.For example ,clan name of Qi monarch is not invariablenes,some of them both have clan name Qi（齐） and Lv（吕）,and someone ' clan name is not uncertain .--星光下的人 (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi 星光下的人. The true is that I don't speak chinese fluently. Please make the corrections where are you considering that they are needed. --Daduxing (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British monarchs' family tree, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frederick V and Frederick III. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish monarchs' family tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Máel Muire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Family tree of the German monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eleonora Gonzaga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kings of Portuga family tree
Hi, Daduxin. I saw your recent edit in the Kings of Portugal family tree. I don't know how to do it and wonder if you could fix it. In the Burgundians, Amadeus III and his wife Mahaut appear as the parents of Dulce de Barcelona, but they were the parents of Matilda of Savoy, wife of Afonso I of Portugal. Many thanks, --Maragm (talk) 18:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for pointing out Maragm. --Daduxing (talk) 05:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Chouchi family tree
After you finish Tuyuhun family tree, i would like to see you to make Chouchi (a Chinese/Di local regime in modern-day Gansu) family tree. :) --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 13:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Border colors:

--SMB99thx XD (contribs) 13:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * - 1st phase of Chouchi
 * - 2nd phase of Chouchi
 * - Wuxing state
 * - Yinping state

Don’t add too many or long family trees to the Chinese emperors articles because there is a template limit, and if you pass it the charts won’t display properly. Especially the Western Xia rulers one. Generally I prefer that the charts to be on the states articles rather then to be jumbled up together on the Chinese emperors family tree articles. Don’t delete them from there.
 * Hi SMB99thx. I usually translate those family trees from chinese wikipedia and I couldn't find one of the Chouchi rulers. But I will keep looking for informations.
 * Thanks for that.--SMB99thx XD (contribs) 05:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Help!
Hello.

I have added a branch to the House of Bernadotte in the article on British monarchs' family tree. However, there is a frame around it, despite the fact that I have copied the parameters from other "House"-branches, which are unframed. I can't figure out why. Can you help me?

Thanks in advance.

HandsomeFella (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Done it --Daduxing (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

What I did was to switch back on familytree.js view and then back to chart template format. Than it's simply working. The parameters are working fine with the charts not made with the script and it is strange why is not working in this case. --Daduxing (talk) 08:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I can't see that you touched the line in question – all I can see is that you reordered the definitions on another row, where I had moved two persons to the right of two other persons. Is that what caused it?
 * HandsomeFella (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No. It is because of the script that I'm using to make this family trees ( the familytree.js). I don't know the reason, I'm not a programmer, but after switching from familytree.js view to template chart view, I (you) can't add new HTML parameters, like that boxstyle. You can add or modify the existing text, but not to add new HTML parameters.

Family tree of Confucius in the main line of descent
The family tree is to show the main line family members- those with the surname Kong. You are clogging and congesting the bottom of the tree with non relevant members and siblings. Most of the previous members over the past 1,000 years had several wives, multiple children (both sons and daughters) yet these wives and most of the children aren't shown on the tree unless they are famous or a founder of an important cadet branch. There is no reason for the recent generations starting at Kong Lingyi should be given special treatment.

It would make more sense to show the tree of the southern branch at Quzhou with the current head Kong Xiangkai 孔祥楷 or the other major cadet branches, like the one founded by Kong Shao 孔紹 in Korea, or even H. H. Kung's cadet branch, since he is at least famous and has his own article. All of those cadet branches are more significant than the siblings and wives of Kung Te-cheng, and the siblings and wives of his sons and grandchildren. I am of the opinion that your recent additions should be reverted.Rajmaan (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Done it!--Daduxing (talk) 18:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tone Kham
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Daduxing, thanks for creating Tone Kham!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please do not create articles without sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of aircraft carriers of the United States Navy, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  17:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Thewolfchild That was not a test and there wasn't any broken markup. I think that it's more logical (comfortable) to have the key at the top of the table instead at the bottom. First you note the key then you read the table. It's more logical than to go through the table without understanding the colours, see the key at the end, and then to scroll up again to re-read it. Stop sending me useless messages. I have been here long enough to know what I have to do. Have a nice day --Daduxing (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see now. The key didn't (and doesn't) show up in your edit on my mobile device, but does on my laptop. I don't know what that's about, but you couldn't know that. But that said, you've also been here long enough to know that edit summaries are not only helpful in this regard but customary. The article layout has been as such for quite some time, it wouldn't hurt to ask on the talk page if the key should be moved. I don't really have a preference either way, but if mobile users can't see it, that's a problem. I will ask about that at the Village Pump/technical issues in the meantime.- the WOLF  child  18:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thewolfchild Are you sure that it's not displaying well on mobile. It's looking well to me (link). It wouldn't be the first time when I hear that mobile phones are not displaying well the pages. If it's not displaying well it's better to keep the key at the bottom. My problem with the edit summary is that I don't have patience to write something every time that I make a minor edit. My bad, I should use it more often.--Daduxing (talk) 06:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

About Mạc Thái Tổ
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mạc Thái Tổ a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Zanhe (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 08:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Mary, Queen of Scots
Please take a look at Talk:Mary, Queen of Scots. I also kindly ask you to read WP:BRD. Surtsicna (talk) 13:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Qing family tree
The reason I edit is I just remove the person unecessary.

November 2017
Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * First I don't know about what article/edit you are talking about. Second stop sending me useless messages. I have been here long enough to know what I have to do. Have a nice day --Daduxing (talk) 07:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Family tree script
I can't get the Family tree script to work. I tried editing in internet explorer, tried adding the entire text to my vector.js page, I switched between source and visual editor multiple times, tried reformatting the script page, clearing the cache, disabling twinkle, the previous things in combination, nothing works. Can you help me? Koopinator (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . You are doing nothing wrong. The problem started when the old Template:Chart was renamed to Template:Tree chart and the script doesn't recognize the new name of the template. I will ask someone to edit it because I don't know what exactly to modify. I already pointed out the issue here but nobody paid attention to it. --Daduxing (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW. To import the script add only   like you did here --Daduxing (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Familytree.js
I can fix that part of the script User:Daduxing/familytree.js, but I presume that you copied it from somewhere. It would be bettter if the original author made the modification. -- PBS (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Daduxing! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)