User talk:DaeSkaarj

Notability for bands
I've deleted the page for Cnoc An Tursa because ultimately, there's nothing there that really showed how the group passes WP:BAND. We need to have coverage in sources that are independent of the band and in places we'd consider reliable. For example, a review of their music from AllMusic would be a reliable source. The band's official website or a merchant site would not be usable. Nobody was really questioning the accuracy of the page, just the notability. A page can have 100% accurate information, but if the topic still fails notability guidelines it will run the risk of being deleted. You have to establish notability by showing us sources that show that the band passes notability guidelines. Saying that sources exist elsewhere isn't really a good argument against deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

DaeSkaarj, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Notability
Hi Tokyogirl79,

I understand the science behind the acquittal of the article, and I can reference their notability from other sources; but I'm concerned this policy is being used for tertiary profitability i.e. advertising out with the original policy of the accumulation of knowledge.

Regardless, here is their AllMusic profile http://www.allmusic.com/artist/cnoc-an-tursa-mn0003052781

Can this article be free of further questionable sourcing, as I understand I'm not the first subscriber to detail this Band on Wikipedia. There are many sources that attest this Groups verity but none I would freely advertise without the consent of the Artists themselves.

All the best

DaeSkaarj