User talk:Daemonic Kangaroo/Archive18

Portland Fire Station No. 7
I've addressed your concerns about Portland Fire Station No. 7; please see my comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Portland Fire Station No. 7. Prioryman (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Peter Dench
Thanks for your work on Peter Dench. Is there anything you can do to help with Articles_for_deletion/Peter_DenchLopifalko (talk) 09:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

new articles
thanks for cleaning up my articles can you do me a favor,a wikipedia editor aks has put deletion notices on some of my pages,since you seem to know about football i thought maybe you can help .i think the editor doesn't know notability criteria for footballers he even put a deletion notice for Etienne Mendy who made over 200 appearences for ligue 1 and ligue 2,lol all you need is 1 appearence for a top league to be notable not alone 200. the articles are Fabien Farnolle, Sacha Petshi Etienne Mendy also if your interested he deletion notice on 2 of my karate articles both the karateka won medals at the highest level of karate which is european or world championships, they areRobert Gomis and Olivier Beaudry i would appreciate the help thanks  — Precedingunsigned comment added by Lesueur878 (talk •contribs) 11:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just closed 2 of them under WP:SNOW], and another admin closed a third; I left [[Robert Gomis because I'm not as absolutely certain that that nomination is guaranteed to fail (WP:SNOW has pretty high standards). Qwyrxian (talk) 05:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

physistical
A boring physics class? Funny, almost abusive. Regardless, I fail to understand the idea to remove this page? I have received and email and letter from the "Oxford University Press" "Oxford Dictionaries" and "Scottish Qualifications Authority" today regarding its authenticity and creation, 12th January 2012, no wonder there is no use of it. If "In Popular Culture" section is unacceptable it can be removed. This article must continue. I would have to verify it with the senders, but could post a PDF of a letter, email and future article from the Oxford Dicionaries and University Press regarding its introduction to society and the language? PhysicsDude21 (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

How do you copy and paste?
This is for something completely unrelated to football, but I wanted to ask someone so I thought of you because you always seem to be editing articles. The question is, as in the header, how do you copy and paste? Thanks. 109.153.9.10 (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Beijing (name)
I appreciate your efforts to standardize the Beijing (name) article, but renaming it Etymology of Beijing may be unduly narrowing the intended scope of this article, which is intended to cover not only the etymology origins of the name, Beijing, but also other names that the city of Beijing had in its past. The article is designed to cover all content that previously was under the subsection of the Beijing article entitled Etymology and names in the main Beijing article. ContinentalAve (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi. Thank you for your editing to the Podilskyi Metro Bridge. For more convenient future cooperation, please consider not editing the article as long as it is marked with Template:In use;) Thank you one more time, Ukrained (talk) 20:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello Daemonic Kangaroo. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however,  that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles shouldnot be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), pure vandalism (G3), and copyright violations (G12) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Your tag was correct, but consider slowing down a little.Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 05:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Verbena United Methodist Church
Hello Dawmonic Kangaroo, and thanks you for the help for the new church Wikipedia page. You expressed concern of the information on the Wikipedia page being similar to that of the official website. I don't know the proper procedure for this, but I am the auothor of the official website, and the website content is original. Additionally, I would like to upload photos that I own. Rsreneau (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The file : has an uncertain copyright status and may be deleted. You can comment on its removal.

Possibly unfree File:Bert Freeman.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bert Freeman.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on thefile description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8gHi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 04:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Cornwall House
Welcome to MonmouthpediA. I see you modded the coords. Do you know how we could use a map of Monmouth instead? Might be more relevant to the 40 buildings that have been done. If not ... any idea who? Victuallers (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks for that DK ... cheers Victuallers (talk) 13:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Elma Yerburgh
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: ISW Hoogeland
Hello Daemonic Kangaroo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ISW Hoogeland, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please check.
Fabregas0414 (talk) 10:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Mis-recategorisation
Just wanted to let you know I've undone your edit because Tauntons' isn't a school (the same as 'Itchen College and Southampton City College) -- Fluteflute TalkContributions 16:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Buildings in Southampton
I'm not sure why you made this edit - the name for Avenue St Andrews has never been "St Andrews United Reform Church" and the Swaythling Methodist Church building was recently renamed "286" as evidenced on it's official website (and those of the other churches that manage the building). Your opinion on whether or not the name is "meaningless" is irrelevant. waggers (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The English Heritage and Southampton City Council websites refer to both churches by the names I used when creating the template. SeeSt Andrew's United Reformed Church, Southamptonand Swaythling Methodist Church. The template is about the buildings themselves, rather than the organisation that occupies them. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Exactly. In the case of 286 the building is called 286, Swaythling Methodist Church is the name of one of the organisations occupying the building. Because it's a recent change the city council and English Heritage resources haven't been updated to reflect the change, but that doesn't alter the fact that the official name for the building is now 286. We have adequate references to evidence this (on the article itself). On the subject of Avenue St Andrew's, the denomination is "United Reformed Church" not "United Reform Church" - and again, there are plenty of sources outside of the two you've mentioned to evidence that the building is more generally referred to as "Avenue St Andrew's" rather than plain "St Andrew's". waggers (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Of course the 286 listed buildings entry is actually entitled "Swaythling Methodist Church Including Church Hall, Workshops and Manse, Southampton" - I hope you're not suggesting that's what we should put in the template! waggers (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I have amended the template to show 286 (Swaythling Methodist Church) and Avenue St. Andrew's Church. I think it's helpful to keep the reference to Swaythling Methodist Church as very few people would know where "286" is. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I think that's a great compromise. waggers (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
waggers (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Townhill Park House
I'd be interested in your views regarding: Should Townhill Park House redirect to Townhill Park instead? Should it be an article in its own right instead of a redirect? Or should the house history be copied to the school article? (Or something else?) The status quo doesn't sit quite right with me.waggers (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Townhill Park House - currently a redirect to The Gregg School
 * The Gregg School - a very short article about the school with little mention of the house / its history
 * Townhill Park - a fairly short article about the area, including the history of the house and gardens
 * I think that the Townhill Park House article ought to be expanded into an article about the house with a short paragraph about it currently being used by the school. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you help me?
Dear Daemonic Kangaroo,

Last time on my Samena Capital article, you fixed up over 30 of my messed up references. I am extremely grateful to you for that, as I simply could not find out how to fix the problems! I request you to help me with my AGAIN with my references for my new article about the founder of Samena Capital, Shirish Saraf. The page is at Shirish Saraf.

Thank you for your help!

Pradyumn444 (talk) 15:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Caroline Birley
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

2003 FA Cup Final
Just to let you know I will be expanding this article, so feel free to contribute if you wish. Should be completed by the end of this week hopefully, preferably ready for a WP:GAC. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
waggers (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

OS Grid refs
Hi, why is it necessary to give a railway station grid reference to ten figures? That is an accuracy of one metre, which isoverprecise. Consider that Southampton Central railway station is known to be long enough for a 13-coach train - assuming that a coach is 20 m long, that gives 260 metres for the platform. Published grid refs for railway stations etc. normally show 6-figure accuracy - that is 100 metres - so whilst going to 8 figures (10 m) may be justifiable in some circumstances, but a 10-figure accuracy is not.-- Red rose64 (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)