User talk:Daersalohcin

Deletion discussion about SalesLabs
Hello, Daersalohcin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether SalesLabs should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/SalesLabs.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wikianoldie (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Nic Read
You'd be well advised to stop pumping full the article about yourself with any more promotional and poorly sourced material. Wikipedians take a particularly dim view of conflict of interest editors and your actions may soon get you into a sticky situation. You could do worse than take a good look at WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY which explains the general problems.

Citing information about a book to the book's sales page, or citing information about your collaborators' to their LinkedIn profile are some of the most obvious no-no's. Information needs to be cited to sources that are reliable and completely independent (journalistic or peer-edited academic works for example). Sionk (talk) 02:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Very helpful advice. Thanks. Now working through the material to ascertain which items appear to be 'promotional' so they can be deleted. Daersalohcin 03:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nic Read, author & researcher.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nic Read, author & researcher.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nic-read/1a/562/a1. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

The reference to linkedin was provided because of misreading the photo upload instructions, which seemed to seek an online reference. The file was actually uploaded from a hard drive on the computer I am using, from a personal iPhoto folder, having been taken with my Canon EOS camera. An email has been sent to authorise the photos use, to permissions-en@wikimedia.org Daersalohcin (talk) 06:05, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Daersalochin 06:02 (UTC) 28 November 2013

Your submission at Articles for creation: SalesLabs International (December 29)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SalesLabs International concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SalesLabs International, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SalesLabs International


Hello Daersalohcin. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SalesLabs International".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:SalesLabs logo, Nov 2013.jpg


The file File:SalesLabs logo, Nov 2013.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Nic Read for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nic Read is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nic Read until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)