User talk:Daffodealio

November 2015
Your recent editing history at University of Canterbury shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I have just read your message after making a reversion. I will not make another one and will follow your instructions henceforth.  I apologize for the most recent reversion - it will not happen again.Daffodealio (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing Wikipedia only to push a particular view, including through sustained edit warring of biased material. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Nick-D (talk) 02:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)