User talk:Dafoeberezin3494

Thanks!
Thanks for your work in merging Friedrich Seitz to Fritz Seitz...sorry I didn't realize there was already an article for him before I wrote that one! But you did a nice job, and I just wanted to thank you for that...and, since I see you haven't really been "welcomed" yet, here's an official one...although, it looks like you quite have the way of the wiki already! Best wishes, and thanks again! -- Violin  G  irl ♪ 21:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

-- Violin  G  irl ♪ 21:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the Van Gogh template
Nice work! Thanks. Stumps 17:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Highly welcome, really great! --RPD 17:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Composers
Regarding your response : cordially Musikfabrik 20:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If your goal with this revamping of the whole "composers" genre is to make one neat list, I'm afraid that this is completely unrealistic. If you're eliminating lists now, they're going to eventually be needed when all of the people who have articles are finally on the site.  These catagories WILL have to be established at some point, so they should be here to be used.   Eventually this combined page is going to turn into a huge monster, and probably sooner than you think.
 * Whether or not the list of composers whose names start with "S" should have been deleted or not is not the problem from my vantage point. What I'm seeing is that the useful structure that was here is now being taken out and that the structure being put in place will soon be even worse than it was before.  I'm wondering if you might consider discussing this with the "composers" project at [] before you do all of this editing, since it appears that a lot of things are being decided there which go against what you're doing here, at least as I've read the discussion.  I noticed that you weren't part of this project, but since you're working on the same thing, you might perhaps want to run these things by them first, since they're doing the same things...They might even appreciate some of your ideas.
 * There are no ways of completely avoiding POV issues in dealing with any aspects of anything really, but the whole idea of encylpedic thought, according to the French 18th century tradition (Diderot and Voltaire etc) was to avoid making hierarchies and saying that "X is better than Y". An encylopedia just presents the fact, without making judgements about whether they are good or not.  The idea of making levels goes against the whole point of an encylopedia in the first place, at least as the idea was intended by the people who first came up with the idea.
 * I dug out my orchestral score of Peer Gynt Suite No. 1 which I've conducted many times before and my edition just says "Morgan" which means "Morning" in English. I've noticed that this title has been used before, but perhaps it's only this edition.  It's a fairly reliable German edition, however.....
 * I'm happy to see that Category:Zarzuela composers was not deleted. That would have been a pity.


 * The small lists are small not because there isn't anything to be put there : there ARE composers in every country of the world who deserve articles. I could make a list of important composers from Azerbaidjan and double the length of your page (with the corresponding articles) in just a few days. This would make it appear that there are more composers in Azerbaidjan than in Germany (actually, these days, that's probably true....) and would appear to create a hierarchy where none exists.  Is this what you're trying to do?
 * The "information nuggets", from my point of view, do hurt things because they only give people what they're expecting to see. An encylopedia should not just tell people what they already know: it should tell people  something about what's there.  The whole point of the Encyclopédistes in 18th century France was that the Church and the State had build up an entire artificial structure which explained the Universe.  The objective of the Encyclopédistes was to try to describe the contents of the Universe, but outside of this imposed structure.  The "information nuggets" impose the structure which people expect to see.
 * However, if you turn your logic around, saying that these items "don't hurt"....couldn't you say the same thing about the pages that you're trying to delete, such as "List of Irish Composers"? It's true that they don't help, but they don't hurt either...Cordially Musikfabrik 08:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

New Grove
Since you asked, here is the link to the New Grove online dictionary. . You can probably consult it for free at the University of Michigan Library. Cordially Musikfabrik 23:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

VG
Stumps is also an active contributor to VG. I'm mainly doing style tidying now.

Re. Notable works. Hmm. How does one get citations for these. I dare say there are books that state it. OK, at first inspection, works that I think don't belong are Falling Autumn Leaves, L'Allée des Alyscamps, Starry Night Over the Rhone, Portrait de l'artiste sans barbe (there are far more notable self portraits), Thatched Cottages by a Hill and Peasant Woman Against a Background of Wheat. They are not his real classics, reproduced as such in books, for example.

Some that are missing: Vincent's Chair with Pipe, Portrait of Pere Tanguy, Fishing Boats on the Shore at Saintes-Maries, Portrait of Joseph Roulin, La Berceuse, Self Portrait with Bandaged Ear and Pipe (Chicago), Self Portait with Bandage Ear (Courtauld Institute), Self Portrait (1889, Musee D'Orsay).

What do you reckon? Feel free to copy relevant portions to article talk page.

Tyrenius 04:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Machlis Book and my edits on these pages
I know this book: it's a textbook generally used to teach Music Appreciation classes for non-music majors in American Universities. It's very useful for that purpose, but it's not exactly "cutting edge" scholarship since it only provides basic information. There are many other books which go into these subjects with more depth, and a good basic resource which is the New Grove Dictionary. They generally ask the top scholars on each subject to write the articles and while it's not complete by any means, it's usually the best "basic" information out there and adds quite a bit of advanced information in quite a few subjects. I'm suggesting it because it should be easy to consult in a University setting.
 * If you note on your nomination of "List of Romantic composers" as a featured list, someone else has picked up the POV issues as they are presented in the comments on these lists. Terms such as "the greatest", "the most significant", "the most important", and even "the first" (almost always impossible to prove) should be avoided in this context.  The problem is that you create these terms on one list, and then you export them to many others.  To be consistent, I was changing the POV statements which were on several lists.  I was following your edits, trying to catch all of these.  Since you're generating so many of these lists, all with the same POV issues, that this had to be addressed before it got out of hand....if it hasn't already.
 * Please remember that none of these pages, other than personal pages and attached talk pages are the property of any one person. While there are examples of "selective" pages which are sucessful here, you will note (as is quite evident on the List of major opera composers if you have a look at the talk page), they are generally done as part of a group decision-making process in which all of the decisions are put to a vote by people participating on that page. What I perceive here is that you are generating the content of these lists using your own views on the subjects.  While this is a valid expression of your own tastes, it's perhaps not ideal for an encylopedia.
 * In the light of this, I really think that it would be a good idea for you to interact with the composers project that I mentioned to you earlier.  I noticed that you added a few catagories to their structural list, but didn't see any introductions made.  I believe that, in the long run, if your work here is to be successful, it has to be in the context of this sort of collegial decision-making process and not just arbitrary decisions made by one individual.
 * Please do not perceive this as an attack on you personally. I'm simply trying to give you ideas for improving the quality of your work here. Musikfabrik 08:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Template talk:Vincent van Gogh
I've started a discussion on the template. Would you be able to centre the orange title on the bottom two. It was always intended to be centred (which is best, as you pointed out), but I've just tried numerous code variations and still can't do it! Thanks. Tyrenius 01:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

List of uncategorized composers
I noticed that you were the one who originally merged this with List of composers. What was the reasoning behind this? I was just wondering, because I've now suggested splitting it off again, and don't want to go against whatever consensus was behind the merge. Rohirok 19:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * What do you think about splitting it out again, or moving it to a project page under List of composers? After all, it is a sort of project page which you are gradually working through to categorize composers.


 * I don't see the advantage of any sort of general and solely alphabetical list, even if the letters are split into separate lists. Making such a list would be a massive undertaking, especially if it is to include all those normally referred to as songwriters, and I believe such a list would qualify as an indiscriminate collection of information, which Wikipedia is not supposed to be. Rohirok 03:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

List of composers by name
Thank you for adding so many composers this list in just 24 hours. I appreciate that. I think that it's probably better that we not add "songwriters" until the RFC has been discussed by others, but please feel free to add your comments (negative or positive, as it's about finding consensus) to that section of the talk page. Cordially Musikfabrik 20:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
First year of music school at the school you're going to can get pretty intense. Don't forget to practice either! It's probably the only time in your life where you'll have time to put in long practice hours and that's where you build up your technique for later. Good luck! Musikfabrik 09:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

List of Romantic Composers
I'm afraid I don't have a source as such, but if I might make a suggestion, why not just take a few standard books and encyclopedias about music or more general encyclopedias, read the sections on romantic composers, note down names mentioned in the articles/sections, then compare? It'd probably work. Adam Cuerden talk 15:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

May I offer you
for your Van Gogh template, with best wishes for your start in real life and the hope that you will be back, as soon as your time allows? --RPD 23:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jackson, MI
I'm not sure what an FA is as I'm a sporadic editor with little knowledge of all of the nuances and such of the site, but I thought I'd add the chart. Thanks. --Criticalthinker 01:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC) OK so why did you start the Jackson High Michigan Link?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeyd3119 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject: Vital Articles
What ever happened to your proposal to start the Vital Articles WikiProject? I feel like the point of the list is so that those articles can be brought up to featured status as quickly as possible. I would support such an endeavor if one got underway. -Selket Talk 00:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Germaine Tailleferre
Hello Dafoeberezin3494, as you edited the Category:Works_by_Germaine_Tailleferre, I would like to get your input on moving it to what I believe is the standard name. The discussion is here: Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_8. Regards, gidonb 23:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Account & page deletions
In reply to your question on my talk page, see Account_deletion. I took care of deleting your sandbox for you. List of composers by nationality is the main article space and other users have contributed to it, so I see no reason for deleting it. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation 00:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: Talk page
No, it's not... I actually didn't use the conventional deletion method, but I'll get on deleting the talk pages too. :-) — Animum ''' |  talk ]] 21:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Nuked — Animum ''' |  talk ]] 22:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Robert M. Pirsig
Category:Robert M. Pirsig, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited California Pacific Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marymount College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of USCAA institutions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canton, New York and Rutland, Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of NCCAA institutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southeastern University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of pitchers to strike out four batters in one inning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Senators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Dark galaxy
Hello! I noticed that you've undo my references. Its okay but please see at the references section. There are two links that have no citation in the article. I tried to fix them.

Thanks, Madmoron (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Madmoron (talk) 06:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks (re: Stephens City page)
Thanks for adding the headline to this reference on the Stephens City, Virginia page. Much appreciated. :) -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 07:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
It's so great to see an article about the Urban Ecology Center finally!!! --Jgmikulay (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Colonial Athletic Association rivalry navbox
Template:Colonial Athletic Association rivalry navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GoingBatty (talk) 02:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

...
Please check out WikiProject Council/Proposals/Collegiate sports (USA)... GWFrog (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central States Football League navbox
Template:Central States Football League navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shostakovich symphonies
Template:Shostakovich symphonies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)