User talk:Dagdamor~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. This account was created for you. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or place  on this page, and someone will be around to help. Again, welcome! --AccReqBot 02:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Simpsons Realities
A tag has been placed on Simpsons Realities, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Simpsons Realities. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Gak Blimby 17:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S.: I know it might be upseting, but it has to be done. The same thing happened to me when I made my first article, too. Gak Blimby 17:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read the talk page, I explained my reasons there. Dagdamor 17:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed the tag because of your argument. Just remember, you MUST include verifyable sources for your assertions that the article is "#1" (being that it is one of the main points of your argument), and any official recognition of the site. If not, I'll have to put the page up for deletion again.Gak Blimby 17:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't refer to any official recognition of the site (i.e. in the books, newspaper, from the Simpsons trademark owners or such), because the site itself is unofficial (as the article says). I can, however, refer to some unofficial mentioning about SR, on other unofficial sites and/or forums. Would be that okay? Dagdamor 18:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * According to Wikipedia:

In general, sources of questionable reliability are sources with a poor reputation for fact-checking or with no fact-checking facilities or editorial oversight. Sources of questionable reliability should only be used in articles about themselves. Articles about such sources should not repeat any potentially libelous claims the source has made about third parties, unless those claims have also been published by reliable sources...

Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources [That includes forums]. Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by a well-known, professional researcher (scholarly or non-scholarly) in a relevant field. These may be acceptable so long as their work has been previously published by reliable third-party publications. However, exercise caution: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.


 * What I recommend is to use any reliable unnoficial sources that you have. If you happen to come across an official mentioning of the site, that would be great. By the way, "Sources of questionable reliability should only be used in articles about themselves" so you can site the website for something it has said. Just remember, don't site forums unless what you're editing is about the forum. Thanks, Gak Blimby 19:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Simpsons Realities
I have responded at my talk page. As I said before you are encouraged to take the deletion to WP:DRV --Steve (Stephen)talk 09:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * For some reasons, all articles on that page were either kept deleted (red links), or deleted and protected from re-creation (blue links). :/ Thanks for suggesting, but I don't believe that would help me much... Dagdamor 10:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The red links are because the articles were deleted and editors take the case to WP:DRV to decide. The article is usually recreated in a user space to be discussed. --Steve (Stephen)talk 03:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dagdamor. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dagdamor~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)