User talk:DagensDagensDagens

January 2024
Hello, I'm Bishonen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lisa Aschan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bishonen &#124; tålk 13:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I was not a mistake I change it because the information is not relevant for wiki, it is for tabloids. The is no source for the quote either. This information has been taken away from the Swedish wiki sight because of this and I think it should be removed for the English as well. All the best, D DagensDagensDagens (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lisa Aschan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Lisa Aschan has explained the the gesture was not towards Gösta Reiland but to the camera that kept filming her and Linda Wassberg that was nominated for best DOP. If you look at the footage of the show you can clearly see that the angle is not towards Gösta Reiland. I also don't see any information about the source of the quote you mention in the article. Due to this too facts the Swedish Wiki has remove this information from the page and I believe this should be done on the English page too. Please respect this and don't put out gossip from tabloids on Wikipedia. DagensDagensDagens (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I have replied to you at Talk:Lisa Aschan; no need to conduct the same discussion here. Please note that edit warring is disruptive and may get you blocked. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC).

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Lisa Aschan. Panian513 18:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Lisa Aschan
Please do not replace cited content because of your own opinions of what happened. ... disco spinster   talk  18:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Do you have any connection with Lisa Aschan?
Hello, DagensDagensDagens. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Lisa Aschan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC).

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Panian513 18:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Lisa Aschan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ... disco spinster   talk  18:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Removed from Swedish Wikipedia?
You have stated several times that the information you keep removing here at English wiki has been removed from Swedish Wikipedia. I don't see anything like that in the page history, so could you give a diff for your claim, please? Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC).
 * Also, things happening over at Swedish Wiki does not necesssrily have an impact on English Wiki.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)