User talk:Dagrqv

Hi, Dagrqv, You may want to check Thomas B. Osborne to see if you have any reason to disagree with the change I just made (but I'm fairly sure it's correct). - Nunh-huh 01:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, I've reverted your recent copy-and-paste move of the article Riksdag. By Wikipedia policy, such moves are deprecated as they destroy the article's edit history. The proper way to move an article in this case is through a move request and community discussion. Additionally, articles should not be moved unilaterally if the move has been discussed before; in this case, the article's title has been discussed three times by the community, and there is an open move request right now. You may weigh in on that move request, but please don't move the article by copy-pasting again. Thanks,Cúchullain t/ c 14:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tied Up Tuesday


The article Tied Up Tuesday has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism referenced only to urban dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tied Up Tuesday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friends with benefits. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)